-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-117398: Add datetime C-API type check test for subinterpreters #119604
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test makes sense. Thanks for adding it. I have one question.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
I have made the requested changes; please review again. |
Thanks for making the requested changes! @ericsnowcurrently: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
It looks like part of your PR was removed by mistake. I thought the new test in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for moving that test! There's just one thing to address and then this PR should be ready to merge. Thanks for your patience.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
I have made the requested changes; please review again. |
Thanks for making the requested changes! @ericsnowcurrently: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks @neonene for the PR, and @ericsnowcurrently for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13. |
…rs (pythongh-119604) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters. (cherry picked from commit 50a3895) Co-authored-by: neonene <[email protected]>
GH-120463 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
Thanks again for all your work on this, @neonene! |
…ers (gh-120463) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters. (cherry picked from commit 50a3895, AKA gh-119604) Co-authored-by: neonene <[email protected]>
…rs (pythongh-119604) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters.
…rs (pythongh-119604) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters.
…rs (pythongh-119604) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters.
Check if the
DateType
C-API type matches thedatetime.date
type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters.@ericsnowcurrently Please review if this usage is not invalid.