-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-106368: Increase Argument Clinic test coverage #106728
gh-106368: Increase Argument Clinic test coverage #106728
Conversation
erlend-aasland
commented
Jul 13, 2023
•
edited
Loading
edited
- improve output_parameter() coverage
- improve coverage for Function.kind
- Issue: Increase Argument Clinic test coverage #106368
I'm probably not the best reviewer for this one, but this all looks reasonable! |
Thanks! I'll expand this PR so we've got better coverage for your FunctionKind PR. |
With this, we're up to approx. 86% test coverage. |
Thanks @erlend-aasland for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11, 3.12. |
Sorry, @erlend-aasland, I could not cleanly backport this to |
) - improve output_parameter() coverage - improve coverage for Function.kind (cherry picked from commit ec45c51) Co-authored-by: Erlend E. Aasland <[email protected]>
GH-106730 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
GH-106731 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
…106730) - improve output_parameter() coverage - improve coverage for Function.kind (cherry picked from commit ec45c51) Co-authored-by: Erlend E. Aasland <[email protected]>
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
…106731) - improve output_parameter() coverage - improve coverage for Function.kind (cherry picked from commit ec45c51) Co-authored-by: Erlend E. Aasland <[email protected]> * Fix merge
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
- improve output_parameter() coverage - improve coverage for Function.kind