-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 581
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for content{Encoding,MediaType} to Draft 7+ #593
Labels
Enhancement
Some new desired functionality
Comments
Julian
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2019
Julian
added
the
Needs Test Upstream
Issues that need to have a test added to https://github.com/json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite
label
Sep 4, 2019
Julian
removed
the
Needs Test Upstream
Issues that need to have a test added to https://github.com/json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite
label
Oct 31, 2019
Only draft7 even allowed these to be treated as assertions it seems, so I think this can be WONTFIXed. If someone ever decides to create a parallel assertion vocabulary for these it can be supported externally. |
Julian
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 28, 2022
Julian
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 9, 2022
ed0b855e7 Merge pull request #594 from json-schema-org/differing-uris ae0651398 Merge pull request #593 from json-schema-org/gregsdennis-propertyDependencies-tests 0ba0976d8 more varied test cases b78035ee5 Merge branch 'gregsdennis-propertyDependencies-tests' of github.com:json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite into gregsdennis-propertyDependencies-tests 8c2b46f7a rework functional tests to better illustrate purpose of keyword 33d9c6486 Update tests/draft-next/propertyDependencies.json de3f7691f Add tests for some more differing URI scenarios. e59510507 additional 'ignore' tests with nested matches fc6cee5ab propertyDependencies non-string property value tests 99f3b60c1 add basic propertyDependencies tests git-subtree-dir: json git-subtree-split: ed0b855e7ea80c37d9295002fe436c01d9c65230
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
http://json-schema.org/latest/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.8.3
This looks like it was made optional.
I guess it can be off-by-default like format, or, since it's at least finite (maybe?) on by default.
Will see later.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: