Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/3.2.x] Fix a false negative for --ignore-patterns #9636

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport b3aceb0 from #9630.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.83%. Comparing base (08359be) to head (cc93f9c).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/3.2.x    #9636   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              95.83%   95.83%           
==================================================
  Files                    174      174           
  Lines                  18891    18892    +1     
==================================================
+ Hits                   18105    18106    +1     
  Misses                   786      786           
Files Coverage Δ
pylint/lint/expand_modules.py 95.29% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

* Fix a false negative for ``--ignore-patterns`` when the directory to be linted is specified using a dot(``.``) and all files are ignored instead of only the files whose name begin with a dot.

Closes #9273

(cherry picked from commit b3aceb0)
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls force-pushed the backport-9630-to-maintenance/3.2.x branch from 29b1581 to cc93f9c Compare May 16, 2024 12:45
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls enabled auto-merge (squash) May 16, 2024 12:47
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls merged commit ee6b62f into maintenance/3.2.x May 16, 2024
23 checks passed
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls deleted the backport-9630-to-maintenance/3.2.x branch May 16, 2024 13:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants