Fix indentation of delegated super type call entry

[paul-dingemans]

Description

Forces the BY keyword in a super type call entry to be indented when preceded by a new line

The code sample from issue #1210 is now formatted as:

object ApplicationComponentFactory : ApplicationComponent.Factory
    by DaggerApplicationComponent.factory()

As a side effect, this also formats

class Test2 : Foo
by Bar(
    a = 1,
    b = 2,
    c = 3
)

to

class Test2 : Foo
    by Bar(
        a = 1,
        b = 2,
        c = 3
    )

Closes #1210

Checklist

• tests are added
• CHANGELOG.md is updated

[romtsn]

Hm, when I throw this code into IJ, it actually keeps it unchanged:

class Test2 : Foo
by Bar(
    a = 1,
    b = 2,
    c = 3
)

Should we maybe just make sure that it doesn't fail, but follow IJ's formatting in this case? Note, however, that this case is fine:

class Test2 : 
    Foo
    by Bar(
        a = 1,
        b = 2,
        c = 3
    )

[paul-dingemans]

You're right. We should not conflict with IntelliJ default of formatting case below:

class Test2 : Foo
by Bar(
    a = 1,
    b = 2,
    c = 3
)

Let me try to fix this one before merging.

[shashachu]

@paul-dingemans let me know if/when this is ready for merging.

[paul-dingemans]

@paul-dingemans let me know if/when this is ready for merging.

@shashachu Merge conflict is resolved. It is ready to be merged.

[romtsn]

@paul-dingemans but have you addressed the comment I left? the test is kinda still not looking compatible with IJ

[paul-dingemans]

@romtsn @shashachu I am sorry. I only focussed at the merge conflict. I did not read the history carefully enough. I will address or submit a PR to revert this tomorrow.

[romtsn]

awesome, thanks 👍

[paul-dingemans]

I will address or submit a PR to revert this tomorrow.

@shashachu @romtsn I have it solved on my local machine. Code however is not production ready yet. Will continue tomorrow.

[paul-dingemans]

@romtsn @shashachu I am sorry. I only focussed at the merge conflict. I did not read the history carefully enough. I will address or submit a PR to revert this tomorrow.

@romtsn @shashachu See #1322 for fix.