-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sink(ticdc): use separate ctx for each DML (#7981) #7985
sink(ticdc): use separate ctx for each DML (#7981) #7985
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has not been approved. To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/run-all-tests |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 8298386
|
/run-verify |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-6.1 #7985 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 62.2369%
================================================
Files ? 894
Lines ? 118563
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 73790
Misses ? 38868
Partials ? 5905 |
/run-verify |
1 similar comment
/run-verify |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #7981
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #7982
What is changed and how it works?
use separate ctx for each DML to avoid the timeout when executing the big Txn.
Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
No
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
No
Release note