Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix incorrect window function cancellation handling (#5818) #5826

Merged

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5818

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #5814

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Fix the bug that window function may cause tiflash crash when canceled.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

ti-chi-bot commented Sep 8, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • SeaRise
  • windtalker

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.1 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.1 from a source PR. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Sep 8, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 8, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 8, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 8, 2022
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Sep 8, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@windtalker windtalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 8, 2022
@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor

SeaRise commented Sep 8, 2022

/rebuild

@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor

SeaRise commented Sep 8, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@SeaRise: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 10db640

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Sep 8, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Sep 8, 2022

Coverage for changed files

Filename                       Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WindowBlockInputStream.cpp         167                34    79.64%          19                 0   100.00%         384                89    76.82%         128                33    74.22%
WindowBlockInputStream.h            26                 2    92.31%          15                 2    86.67%          58                15    74.14%          16                 2    87.50%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                              193                36    81.35%          34                 2    94.12%         442               104    76.47%         144                35    75.69%

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18355      9782             46.71%    206275  97916        52.53%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@SeaRise SeaRise removed the request for review from mengxin9014 September 8, 2022 14:02
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 8, 2022
Comment on lines 91 to 108
diff_res = run_cmd('git diff --name-only')
if diff_res:
files_not_in_contrib = [f for f in diff_res if not f.startswith('contrib')]
files_contrib = [f for f in diff_res if f.startswith('contrib')]
if files_not_in_contrib:
print('')
print('Error: found files NOT formatted')
print(''.join(diff_res))
print(''.join(files_not_in_contrib))
exit(-1)
elif files_contrib:
print('')
print('Warn: found contrib changed')
print(''.join(files_contrib))
print('')
print(''.join(run_cmd('git status')))
else:
print("Format check passed")
else:
cmd = 'clang-format -i {}'.format(' '.join(files_to_format))
if subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, cwd=tics_repo_path).wait():
exit(-1)
print("Finish code format")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor

SeaRise commented Sep 9, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@SeaRise: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 9302690

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Sep 9, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Sep 9, 2022

Coverage for changed files

Filename                       Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WindowBlockInputStream.cpp         167                34    79.64%          19                 0   100.00%         384                89    76.82%         128                33    74.22%
WindowBlockInputStream.h            26                 2    92.31%          15                 2    86.67%          58                15    74.14%          16                 2    87.50%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                              193                36    81.35%          34                 2    94.12%         442               104    76.47%         144                35    75.69%

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18355      9782             46.71%    206275  97915        52.53%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit d16dde3 into pingcap:release-6.1 Sep 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.1 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.1 from a source PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants