Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: check the error returned by handleNoDelay #36105

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 13, 2022

Conversation

zyguan
Copy link
Contributor

@zyguan zyguan commented Jul 11, 2022

Signed-off-by: zyguan [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #35105

Problem Summary:
As described in #35105, statements might be partial commited by explain analyze.

What is changed and how it works?

Also check the error returned by handleNoDelay (otherwise the err gets ignored when handled is false).

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@zyguan zyguan requested review from qw4990 and time-and-fate July 11, 2022 14:17
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 11, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • time-and-fate
  • xhebox

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. needs-cherry-pick-4.0 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.0 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.1 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.2 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.3 Type: Need cherry pick to release-5.3 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.4 Should cherry pick this PR to release-5.4 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 11, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 11, 2022

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jul 12, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jul 13, 2022
@xhebox
Copy link
Contributor

xhebox commented Jul 13, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: af77875

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 13, 2022
@zyguan
Copy link
Contributor Author

zyguan commented Jul 13, 2022

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 28c9600 into pingcap:master Jul 13, 2022
ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-4.0 in PR #36184

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.0 in PR #36185

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.1 in PR #36186

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.2 in PR #36187

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.3 in PR #36188

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.4 in PR #36189

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-6.0 in PR #36190

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-6.1 in PR #36191

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 13, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

✅ Well Done! New fixed [1] after this pr merged.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test ✅ all 36 tests passed 30 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 29 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 12 tests passed 15 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 13 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 9 min 4 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 8 min 6 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 6 min 33 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 5 min 53 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 18 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

joycse06 added a commit to joycse06/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
* master: (27 commits)
  executor: parallel cancel mpp query (pingcap#36161)
  store/copr: adjust the cop cache admission process time for paging (pingcap#36157)
  log-backup: get can restored global-checkpoint-ts when support v3 checkpoint advance (pingcap#36197)
  executor: optimize cursor read point get by reading through pessimistic lock cache (pingcap#36149)
  *: add tidb_min_paging_size system variable (pingcap#36107)
  planner: handle the expected row count for pushed-down selection in mpp (pingcap#36195)
  *: support show ddl jobs for sub-jobs (pingcap#36168)
  table-filter: optimize table pattern message and unit tests (pingcap#36160)
  domain: fix unstable test TestAbnormalSessionPool (pingcap#36154)
  executor: check the error returned by `handleNoDelay` (pingcap#36105)
  log-backup: fix checkpoint display (pingcap#36166)
  store/mockstore/unistore: fix several issues of coprocessor paging in unistore (pingcap#36147)
  test: refactor restart test (pingcap#36174)
  ddl: support rename index and columns for multi-schema change (pingcap#36148)
  test: remove meaningless test and update bazel (pingcap#36136)
  planner: Reduce verbosity of logging unknown system variables (pingcap#36013)
  metrics/grafana: bring back the plan cache miss panel (pingcap#36081)
  ddl: implement table granularity DDL for SchemaTracker (pingcap#36077)
  *: bazel use jdk 17 (pingcap#36070)
  telemetry: add reviewer rule (pingcap#36084)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-cherry-pick-release-5.0 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.1 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.2 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.3 Type: Need cherry pick to release-5.3 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.4 Should cherry pick this PR to release-5.4 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

explain analyze causes wrong result when txn is too large
6 participants