Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store/copr: use non-buffered channel for coprocessor response #35988

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jul 15, 2022

Conversation

tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #35987

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

DistSQL concurrency default value is 16, there are so many workers already.
If we use a buffered channel for the tasks, there will be a lot of data cached in TiDB, consuming a lot of memory.

Change the buffered channel to a non-buffered channel, to reduce the memory footprint.

Note, this change does not make performance regression!

Before

time mysql -h 127.0.0.1 -u root -P 4000 -B ens_rb -e 'set @@tidb_enable_paging = 1; select * from ens_rb.fm_acct_client_relation' > /dev/null

real	2m32.304s
user	1m36.585s
sys	0m7.636s

After

time mysql -h 127.0.0.1 -u root -P 4000 -B ens_rb -e 'set @@tidb_enable_paging = 1; select * from ens_rb.fm_acct_client_relation' > /dev/null

real	2m29.395s
user	1m34.884s
sys	0m7.640s

image

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Use non-buffered channel for coprocessor worker, this change dramatically reduce the memory usage in the full table scan scenario.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 6, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • XuHuaiyu
  • wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Jul 6, 2022
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2022 09:18
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Jul 6, 2022
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also close #34849

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jul 13, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jul 13, 2022
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 11068ad

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 14, 2022
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test
/run-mysql-test

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-mysql-test
/run-unit-test

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/run-unit-test
/run-check_dev_2

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev_2

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2022
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

After #36242 it should work now.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 15, 2022

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit ea306fc into pingcap:master Jul 15, 2022
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao deleted the nonbuffer-cop-chan branch July 15, 2022 10:54
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 15, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [1] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🔴 failed 1, success 0, total 1 54 sec Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 25 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 36 tests passed 25 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 12 tests passed 15 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 6 min 21 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 6 min 2 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 5 min 25 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 3 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 52 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scan a full table consume more memory than I expected
6 participants