Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: rename tiflash fallback switch #22886

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Mar 12, 2021

Conversation

xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor

@xuyifangreeneyes xuyifangreeneyes commented Feb 23, 2021

What problem does this PR solve?

Related PR: #22459

Rename TiFlash fallback switch.

What is changed and how it works?

What's Changed:

Use tidb_allow_fallback_to_tikv instead of tidb_enable_tiflash_fallback_tikv to control the behavior of TiFlash fallback, since there may be new engine types which also need fallback to TiKV in the future.

Related changes

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Release note

  • replace tidb_enable_tiflash_fallback_tikv with tidb_allow_fallback_to_tikv to control the behavior of TiFlash fallback

@xuyifangreeneyes xuyifangreeneyes requested a review from a team as a code owner February 23, 2021 06:20
@xuyifangreeneyes xuyifangreeneyes requested review from XuHuaiyu and removed request for a team February 23, 2021 06:20
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 23, 2021
@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @winoros

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested a review from winoros February 23, 2021 06:22
@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@github-actions github-actions bot added sig/execution SIG execution sig/sql-infra SIG: SQL Infra labels Feb 23, 2021
@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

1 similar comment
@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-tics-test

@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

PTAL @winoros @qw4990

@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @qw4990

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested a review from qw4990 February 26, 2021 08:02
Copy link
Member

@winoros winoros left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@winoros: Please use /LGTM instead of LGTM when you want to approve the pull request by comment.
If you use the GitHub review feature, please approve the PR directly, the comment will not take effect in the GitHub review feature.
If you have any qustions please refer to lgtm command help or lgtm plugin design.

If you have approved this PR, please ignore this reply. This reply is being used as a temporary reply during the migration of the new bot and will be removed on April 1.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 7, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 10, 2021
@xuyifangreeneyes xuyifangreeneyes changed the title *: rename tidb_enable_tiflash_fallback_tikv to tidb_enable_engine_fallback *: rename tiflash fallback switch Mar 10, 2021
@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

Copy link
Member

@zz-jason zz-jason left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@zz-jason: Please use /LGTM instead of LGTM when you want to approve the pull request by comment.
If you use the GitHub review feature, please approve the PR directly, the comment will not take effect in the GitHub review feature.
If you have any qustions please refer to lgtm command help or lgtm plugin design.

If you have approved this PR, please ignore this reply. This reply is being used as a temporary reply during the migration of the new bot and will be removed on April 1.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Mar 12, 2021
@winoros
Copy link
Member

winoros commented Mar 12, 2021

/lgtm

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • winoros
  • zz-jason

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by writing /lgtm in a comment.
Reviewer can cancel approval by writing /lgtm cancel in a comment.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Mar 12, 2021
@zz-jason
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: f81e5d7

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 12, 2021
@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-tics-test

1 similar comment
@winoros
Copy link
Member

winoros commented Mar 12, 2021

/run-tics-test

@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-tics-test

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@xuyifangreeneyes: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@winoros
Copy link
Member

winoros commented Mar 12, 2021

The leak would be fixed by #23288

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority/release-blocker This issue blocks a release. Please solve it ASAP. sig/execution SIG execution sig/sql-infra SIG: SQL Infra size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants