-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make confvals linkable again #924
Comments
That also means, that a confval must be unique (to determine the link destination) and duplicate confval definitions must output a warning (like in Sphinx). This is currently not the case. |
I am working on some idea |
linawolf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore I introduces the possibility of prefixing links to destinguished linkable objects. related #924 releases: main, 1.0
linawolf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore I introduces the possibility of prefixing links to destinguished linkable objects. related #924 releases: main, 1.0
linawolf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore, I introduce the possibility of prefixing links to distinguished linkable objects. related #924 releases: main, 1.0
linawolf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore, I introduce the possibility of prefixing links to distinguished linkable objects. related #924 releases: main, 1.0
linawolf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore, I introduce the possibility of prefixing links to distinguished linkable objects. related #924 releases: main, 1.0
phpdoc-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore, I introduce the possibility of prefixing links to distinguished linkable objects. related #924 releases: main, 1.0 (cherry picked from commit 3ef4ee0)
phpdoc-bot
pushed a commit
to phpDocumentor/guides-core
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore, I introduce the possibility of prefixing links to distinguished linkable objects. related phpDocumentor/guides#924 releases: main, 1.0
phpdoc-bot
pushed a commit
to phpDocumentor/guides-restructured-text
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore, I introduce the possibility of prefixing links to distinguished linkable objects. related phpDocumentor/guides#924 releases: main, 1.0
phpdoc-bot
pushed a commit
to phpDocumentor/guides-core
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore, I introduce the possibility of prefixing links to distinguished linkable objects. related phpDocumentor/guides#924 releases: main, 1.0 (cherry picked from commit 3ef4ee08b2049e485d6fb30beb85ee1cbbeb883d)
phpdoc-bot
pushed a commit
to phpDocumentor/guides-restructured-text
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2024
If we have both an anchor like '.. _demo:' and a confval of the same name we would get duplicate id's and the links to those two elements could not be distinguished. Sphinx solves this by prefixing all confval links with "confval-". Therefore, I introduce the possibility of prefixing links to distinguished linkable objects. related phpDocumentor/guides#924 releases: main, 1.0 (cherry picked from commit 3ef4ee08b2049e485d6fb30beb85ee1cbbeb883d)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Feature request
Make confvals linkable again
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: