Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Completing Color Profile #83

Closed
Luisav1 opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Completing Color Profile #83

Luisav1 opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Luisav1
Copy link
Contributor

Luisav1 commented Jul 5, 2023

Will focus on adding color properties in the nuclide chart to complete design of color scheme for nuclide chart. Such that @ariel-phet is not blocked.

@Luisav1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Luisav1 commented Jul 7, 2023

@ariel-phet the color profiling of the chart and the sim is ready to go for your testing. The color profiling of the energy levels (#85) and of some of other parts of the sim are not supported but if you'd like it to be, we'd be happy to add that, just let us know.

@ariel-phet
Copy link
Contributor

@Luisav1 @zepumph lets go with the following colors for the Chart/Magic numbers (tested all these carefully with all the various color blind tests, and they show contrast in all cases) These colors also fulfill Jason's feedback that the Beta minus/plus decays should seems a similar hue when compared to the stable color. Listed in (R,G,B) format

  • buildANucleus.protonEmissionColor (247,2,92)
  • buildANucleus.neutronEmissionColor (255,31,255)
  • buildANucleus.betaPlusColor (133, 202, 255)
  • buildANucleus.betaMinusColor (148, 245, 245)
  • buildANucleus.alphaColor (40,215,86)
  • buildANucleus.nuclideChartBorderMagicNumberColor (251,255,36)

@zepumph
Copy link
Member

zepumph commented Jul 31, 2023

Excellent. Committed above. Thanks @ariel-phet. Closing

image

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants