This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
BlockId removal: refactor: StorageProvider #12510
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It changes the arguments of `Backend::StorageProvider` trait from: block: `BlockId<Block>` to: hash: `&Block::Hash` This PR is part of BlockId::Number refactoring analysis (paritytech/substrate#11292)
michalkucharczyk
added
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
B0-silent
Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
D3-trivial 🧸
PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit
labels
Oct 17, 2022
This was referenced Oct 17, 2022
bkchr
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2022
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
dmitry-markin
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Is it possible to move block hash from BlockId
lookup one level up out of the functions affected, so that there is no HeaderBackend
constraint added? Or is it planned for the next iterations of the refactoring?
altonen
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2022
Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Markin <[email protected]>
skunert
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2022
bkchr
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2022
bot merge |
ark0f
pushed a commit
to gear-tech/substrate
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2023
* BlockId removal: refactor: StorageProvider It changes the arguments of `Backend::StorageProvider` trait from: block: `BlockId<Block>` to: hash: `&Block::Hash` This PR is part of BlockId::Number refactoring analysis (paritytech/substrate#11292) * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> * Update client/api/src/backend.rs Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Markin <[email protected]> * GrandpaBlockImport::current_set_id reworked * ExportStateCmd reworked * trigger CI job * trigger CI job Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Markin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
B0-silent
Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
D3-trivial 🧸
PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It changes the arguments of
Backend::StorageProvider
trait from:block:
BlockId<Block>
to: hash:&Block::Hash
This PR is part of BlockId::Number refactoring analysis (paritytech/polkadot-sdk#53)
polkadot companion: paritytech/polkadot#6160
cumulus companion: paritytech/cumulus#1770