Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Avoid trap asset amount below a threshold #901

Open
xlc opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Avoid trap asset amount below a threshold #901

xlc opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
T6-XCM This PR/Issue is related to XCM.

Comments

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Nov 30, 2021

By default XCM pallet should not unconditionally trap assets. It should only trap assets with known value greater than some threshold to avoid dust storage issue. The storage will become economically inaccessible if the tx fee to claim trapped asset is greater than the assets to be claimed and those asset should just be dropped (or redirect to elsewhere).

Relates to paritytech/polkadot#4402

@KiChjang
@KiChjang KiChjang added the T6-XCM This PR/Issue is related to XCM. label Dec 4, 2021
@Sophia-Gold Sophia-Gold transferred this issue from paritytech/polkadot Aug 24, 2023
@xlc xlc mentioned this issue Mar 5, 2024
Closed
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2024
@tomusdrw
Fix outstanding bridge names. (paritytech#901)
f8586fd
@Polkadot-Forum
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on Polkadot Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.polkadot.network/t/asset-hub-brainstorming-session-call-notes-and-discussion-continuation/7260/5

@acatangiu acatangiu mentioned this issue May 8, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
T6-XCM This PR/Issue is related to XCM.
Projects
Bridges + XCM
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@xlc @KiChjang @Polkadot-Forum