-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 378
Conversation
…eserve-asset-transfer
Config looks ok based on the xcm simulator test with a similar mock runtime here: |
…Statemine and Westmint
…eserve-asset-transfer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
3 comments, but they all apply to the statemint and westmint XCM configs.
On another note, the syntax for the XCM config is arcane, I wonder if we can use some macro magic to solve it...?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks okay to me.
I assume we have tested this locally and all that?
Also an end to end test on westend when that is ready would be good
As mentioned it was tested via XCM sim. I've had issues getting it to test locally with Polkadot js apps due to types issues (with XCM) and was hoping an end-to-end test on Westend would be enough. |
…eserve-asset-transfer
…eserve-asset-transfer
…h/cumulus into apopiak/reserve-asset-transfer
Tested this sufficiently to merge and then experiment more with a deployment on Westend. |
This PR adds a
FungiblesAdapter
as an asset transactor to Statemint to allow for Reserve-based asset transfers of Statemint assets.Todos