-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 531
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for early ending question assessements #248
Labels
enhancement
End user-perceivable enhancements.
Impact: Low
Low perceived user impact (e.g. edge cases).
Z-ibt
Temporary label for Ben to keep track of issues he's triaged.
Comments
@BenHenning Is this issue and #501 issue is same? |
Broppia
added
issue_type_feature
Impact: Low
Low perceived user impact (e.g. edge cases).
labels
Jul 29, 2022
BenHenning
added
Z-ibt
Temporary label for Ben to keep track of issues he's triaged.
issue_user_learner
labels
Sep 16, 2022
BenHenning
moved this to Needs Triage
in [Team] Core Learner and Mastery flows & UI Frontend - Android
Sep 16, 2022
The issue is reopened because of the following unresolved TODOs: Line 103 in f99fa1d
|
The AI here is to remove the TODO & close this issue. |
6 tasks
seanlip
added
enhancement
End user-perceivable enhancements.
and removed
issue_user_learner
labels
Mar 29, 2023
BenHenning
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2023
## Explanation Fixes #248 Fixes #501 Fixes #179 Fixes #762 Fixes #207 This PR removes some obsolete TODOs so that the corresponding issues on GitHub can be properly closed. ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [x] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).
Uticodes
pushed a commit
to Uticodes/oppia-android
that referenced
this issue
Apr 4, 2023
…olete TODOs. (oppia#4928) ## Explanation Fixes oppia#248 Fixes oppia#501 Fixes oppia#179 Fixes oppia#762 Fixes oppia#207 This PR removes some obsolete TODOs so that the corresponding issues on GitHub can be properly closed. ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [x] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement
End user-perceivable enhancements.
Impact: Low
Low perceived user impact (e.g. edge cases).
Z-ibt
Temporary label for Ben to keep track of issues he's triaged.
When playing through a question assessment, it should be possible for the assessment to end prematurely if the learner has sufficiently demonstrated proficiency in the topic. This is supported by the question assessment progress controller API, but the implementation does not yet provide this functionality.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: