Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverts to dummy response instead of a compile dep on google's empty #64

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 23, 2019

Conversation

codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Member

Empty is the only thing that requires a compile dependency on google
(not standard proto) types. For example, if you use square wire
compiler, you need to add a google library now to compile our proto.

Since we haven't really released the service, yet, and empty is binary
compatible with an equally empty response, we can change.

This reverts to what @ewhauser had originally, which makes things
more portable.

Empty is the only thing that requires a compile dependency on google
(not standard proto) types. For example, if you use square wire
compiler, you need to add a google library now to compile our proto.

Since we haven't really released the service, yet, and empty is binary
compatible with an equally empty response, we can change.

This reverts to what @ewhauser had originally, which makes things
more portable.
zipkin.proto Outdated
@@ -215,6 +213,10 @@ message ListOfSpans {
repeated Span spans = 1;
}

// Response for SpanService/Report RPC. This response currently does not return
// any information beyond indicating that the request has finished.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can consider adding , but may be extended in the future if the flexibility might help later

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds fine to me

Copy link
Member

@basvanbeek basvanbeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let’s do this

@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt merged commit 1727569 into master Apr 23, 2019
@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt deleted the empty-me branch April 23, 2019 23:37
codefromthecrypt pushed a commit to ewhauser/zipkin that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2019
codefromthecrypt pushed a commit to ewhauser/zipkin that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2019
codefromthecrypt pushed a commit to ewhauser/zipkin that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2019
codefromthecrypt pushed a commit to openzipkin/zipkin that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2019
abesto pushed a commit to abesto/zipkin that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants