Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add openshift-service-ca-operator #306

Closed

Conversation

juanvallejo
Copy link

cc @deads2k @mrogers950 @abhinavdahiya

Adds the openshift-service-ca-operator to the installer

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 21, 2018
@mrogers950
Copy link

@juanvallejo thanks! it looks OK to me but we'll need the image available for it to work. So this should wait on openshift/release#1569 (and after that @smarterclayton adding it to the mirrors)

@mrogers950
Copy link

@juanvallejo per @deads2k this should refer to the service-serving-cert-signer images for now. (and also use the operator install manifest from https://github.com/openshift/service-serving-cert-signer/blob/master/install/serving-cert-signer/install.yaml )

@mrogers950
Copy link

@juanvallejo I've opened openshift/service-serving-cert-signer#27 to update the manifests for this repo.

@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the add-service-ca-operator branch from 166c7f1 to 4c46c3f Compare September 24, 2018 19:09
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 24, 2018
@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the add-service-ca-operator branch from 4c46c3f to 7c50c27 Compare September 24, 2018 19:14
config.tf Outdated
hyperkube = "openshift/origin-node:latest"
kube_core_renderer = "quay.io/coreos/kube-core-renderer-dev:3b6952f5a1ba89bb32dd0630faddeaf2779c9a85"
kube_core_operator = "quay.io/coreos/kube-core-operator-dev:3b6952f5a1ba89bb32dd0630faddeaf2779c9a85"
openshift_service_serving_cert_signer_operator = "openshift/origin-service-serving-cert-signer:latest"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this stands out as weird looking.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the variable name here does not need to match the url then it could be shortened to openshift_service_ca_operator, and we can just update the url to point to origin-service-ca when we are ready to do that.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renamed to "openshift_service_ca_operator" and "openshift_service_ca_operator_image"

@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the add-service-ca-operator branch from 7c50c27 to 4ac4aae Compare September 24, 2018 19:26
@mrogers950
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2018
@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the add-service-ca-operator branch from 4ac4aae to 29d0426 Compare September 24, 2018 20:02
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2018
@juanvallejo
Copy link
Author

/test e2e-aws

@juanvallejo
Copy link
Author

aws e2e test failure appears to be a flake:

aws_eip.nat_eip.3: Error creating EIP: AddressLimitExceeded: The maximum number of addresses has been reached.
	status code: 400, request id: 79b9e5cf-97a8-4e40-8788-2fd14b885b07

@mrogers950
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2018
@juanvallejo
Copy link
Author

/retest

@mrogers950
Copy link

mrogers950 commented Sep 25, 2018

@juanvallejo testing the installer with this PR does not result in a running service-serving-cert-signer operator, so there is still something missing.

@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the add-service-ca-operator branch from 29d0426 to 0cebf18 Compare September 25, 2018 16:27
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 25, 2018
@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the add-service-ca-operator branch from 0cebf18 to 3036794 Compare September 25, 2018 18:02
@mrogers950
Copy link

@juanvallejo confirmed, we have operator:

$ oc get all --all-namespaces | grep service
openshift-core-operators            pod/openshift-service-cert-signer-operator-9d49dc8cb-zvhhx   1/1       Running   0          24m
openshift-service-cert-signer       pod/apiservice-cabundle-injector-59f7f9b867-7cwnw            1/1       Running   0          19m
openshift-service-cert-signer       pod/service-serving-cert-signer-7d49c9ddbf-gclkm             1/1       Running   0          19m

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 25, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: juanvallejo, mrogers950
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: aaronlevy

If they are not already assigned, you can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @aaronlevy in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mrogers950
Copy link

@abhinavdahiya this PR is ready to go. Can it be merged or is there anything blocking it?

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

PR #330 adds installing operators using update payload. So the operator will be installed. If we can't get that merged soon: you will have to integrate with new templating code. This terrafirm module is getting deprecated. cc @crawford

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@juanvallejo: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 30, 2018
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

CVO installs openshift-service-ca-operator

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@abhinavdahiya: Closing this PR.

In response to this:

CVO installs openshift-service-ca-operator

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants