Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add radial search feature to main branch #1617

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

junqiu-lei
Copy link
Member

@junqiu-lei junqiu-lei commented Apr 17, 2024

Description

This PR:

Benchmark

#814 (comment)

Issues Resolved

Part of #814

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • Commits are signed as per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

…ect#1546)

* Support distance type radius search for Faiss engine

Signed-off-by: Junqiu Lei <[email protected]>
* Support score type threshold in radial search

Signed-off-by: Junqiu Lei <[email protected]>
…ax_distance (opensearch-project#1609)

* Rename radial search parameters score and distance to min_score and max_distance

Signed-off-by: Junqiu Lei <[email protected]>
@junqiu-lei junqiu-lei added Features Introduces a new unit of functionality that satisfies a requirement skip-changelog v2.14.0 labels Apr 17, 2024
@junqiu-lei junqiu-lei self-assigned this Apr 17, 2024
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Junqiu Lei <[email protected]>
}
if (isClusterOnOrAfterMinRequiredVersion(KNNConstants.RADIAL_SEARCH_KEY)) {
min_score = in.readOptionalFloat();
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: we can have both reads under case if case. not a blocker, can be done in a refactoring PR in future

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, we can do it in future PR

Copy link
Member

@ryanbogan ryanbogan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ryanbogan
Copy link
Member

There are a few tests that are failing still, though

@junqiu-lei
Copy link
Member Author

There are a few tests that are failing still, though

The failing test isn’t related to the PR, I saw same failings in other recent PRs.

@junqiu-lei junqiu-lei merged commit 307609b into opensearch-project:main Apr 17, 2024
48 of 56 checks passed
@junqiu-lei junqiu-lei deleted the radial-search-main branch April 17, 2024 19:58
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-1617-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 307609bbbff4889ecdf76d615157e223023c6df7
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-1617-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-1617-to-2.x.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x Features Introduces a new unit of functionality that satisfies a requirement v2.14.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants