-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modify Accelerator support for kserve #2261
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good, one question...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good... type question was resolved. LGTM.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne, Xaenalt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
I updated the types of |
Description
Closes #2244
How Has This Been Tested?
Prerequisites
Enable accelerator support in your cluster, you can add this accelerator into your cluster:
KServe Resource Creation
ServingRuntime
spec. It shouldn't contain tolerations, neither the gpu requests/limitsnvidia.com/gpu
InferenceService
spec. It should contain tolerations underspec.predictor.tolerations
and the gpu request/limits underspec.predictor.model.resources
KServe Resource Editing
ServingRuntime
spec. It shouldn't be the same, just removing the opendatahub.io/accelerator-name labelInferenceService
spec. It shouldn't contain tolerations underspec.predictor.tolerations
neither the gpu request/limits underspec.predictor.model.resources
Modelmesh Resrouce Creation
ServingRuntime
spec. It should contain tolerations and gpu resourcesInferenceService
spec. It shouldn't contain any gpu resourceTest Impact
Covered all paths with unit testing
Request review criteria:
Self checklist (all need to be checked):
If you have UI changes:
After the PR is posted & before it merges:
main
I haven't tested this changes with a proper gpu cluster, we should do that asap