Cleanup Empty State Text

[ppadti]

Closes: #1857

Description

This PR aims to cleanup empty state text on each of our sections in the Projects view, that is redundant.

How Has This Been Tested?

Create a new data science project and check each section in project view.

Test Impact

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Commits have been squashed into descriptive, self-contained units of work (e.g. 'WIP' and 'Implements feedback' style messages have been removed)
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit tests & storybook for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change (find relevant UX in the SMEs section).

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[ppadti]

cc @andrewballantyne Just reconfirming, whether these are the changes you were expecting from this PR?

[dpanshug]

@andrewballantyne Instead of removing EmptyState description, can't we change it to something meaningful? wdyt @kaedward ?

[andrewballantyne]

@andrewballantyne Instead of removing EmptyState description, can't we change it to something meaningful? wdyt @kaedward ?

This was out of the UX test sessions with Data Scientists feedback with Marc; it was found to be redundant given the action item for each section. @kaedward you get the last say, but both Kyle and I are in agreement this was desired.

[kaedward]

This was out of the UX test sessions with Data Scientists feedback with Marc; it was found to be redundant given the action item for each section. @kaedward you get the last say, but both Kyle and I are in agreement this was desired.

I agree with removing the description! @andrewballantyne

[andrewballantyne]

I can't resolve this today as there is a conflict. @ppadti please rebase.

For UX, here is the before and after... (if they are happy with the change, we can merge this once the conflict is resolved)

---

Before

---

After

[kywalker-rh]

Looks good to me. Thanks for updating it!

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [andrewballantyne]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment