Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix java redirects #4562

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

zeitlinger
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@zeitlinger zeitlinger self-assigned this May 30, 2024
@zeitlinger zeitlinger requested review from a team May 30, 2024 18:02
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
title: Out of the box instrumentation
description: Out of the box instrumentation for the starter
aliases: [../annotations]
aliases: [../instrumentation]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we want the alias to stay under /spring-boot-starter/*, e.g.

Suggested change
aliases: [../instrumentation]
aliases: [instrumentation]

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That alias shouldn't be there in the first place. It's been dropped in #4563.

Copy link
Contributor

@cartermp cartermp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I will defer to @chalin

@chalin
Copy link
Contributor

chalin commented May 30, 2024

@open-telemetry/docs-approvers et al: I think that we need to fine tune our PR review and merging process. I wasn't done reviewing #4554, and that PR wasn't ready to be merged IMHO. In particular (as some of you have noted) because more aliases were needed. I didn't comment on the need for aliases on my first review pass because in my first review pass I suggested some structural changes -- so it didn't make sense to suggest specific aliases until the section structure stabilized.

Any suggestions on how to improve our process? Maybe if on @open-telemetry/docs-approvers makes some suggested changes, wait for them (a reasonable amount of time) to give a final approval?

No big deal, and I'm really just hoping to make our contribution approval process smoother. Lemme know what y'all think.

@cartermp
Copy link
Contributor

I would propose some kind of disclaimer if reviews are being done in stages.

FWIW my general philosophy for this kind of stuff is to bias towards merging when content looks good and keep the flow of PRs going, but I missed that this re-org of pages would need redirects put into place as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@chalin chalin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this PR @zeitlinger. I've submitted an alternative (simpler) fix, see #4563 -- by adding a single extra alias we can address the broken-link issue you faced, without having to introduce a wildcard redirect rule. Also #4563 drops some unnecessary aliases and includes some preliminary copyedits.

All: PTAL at #4563.

@zeitlinger
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for this PR @zeitlinger. I've submitted an alternative (simpler) fix, see #4563 -- by adding a single extra alias we can address the broken-link issue you faced, without having to introduce a wildcard redirect rule. Also #4563 drops some unnecessary aliases and includes some preliminary copyedits.

All: PTAL at #4563.

thanks @chalin - much simpler than my fix!

@zeitlinger zeitlinger closed this May 31, 2024
@zeitlinger zeitlinger deleted the fix-redirects branch May 31, 2024 06:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants