Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for additional Span Limits #2044

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2021

Conversation

owais
Copy link
Contributor

@owais owais commented Aug 17, 2021

Description

Added support for OTEL_SPAN_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE_LENGTH_LIMIT, OTEL_LINK_ATTRIBUTE_COUNT_LIMIT & OTEL_EVENT_ATTRIBUTE_COUNT_LIMIT, and fixes a number of bugs.

Fixes #2045
Fixes #2043
Fixes #2042
Fixes #2041

Otel Specification: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/sdk-environment-variables.md#span-limits-

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Added/updated tests
  • Manual testing

Does This PR Require a Contrib Repo Change?

  • Yes. - Link to PR:
  • No.

Checklist:

  • Followed the style guidelines of this project
  • Changelogs have been updated
  • Unit tests have been added
  • Documentation has been updated

@owais owais requested review from a team, ocelotl and NathanielRN and removed request for a team August 17, 2021 09:20
@owais owais force-pushed the span-attr-length-limit branch 7 times, most recently from b8c6ce2 to 6f25751 Compare August 17, 2021 09:49
"Byte attribute could not be decoded for key `%s`.",
key,
)
return
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these checks were redundant as they're run by BoundedAttributes internally as well.

@owais owais mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2021
11 tasks
@owais owais force-pushed the span-attr-length-limit branch 2 times, most recently from 5c8ef2e to 14d3e46 Compare August 17, 2021 10:18
@owais owais force-pushed the span-attr-length-limit branch from 14d3e46 to 061e72c Compare August 17, 2021 14:50
@owais owais changed the title Add support for OTEL_SPAN_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE_LENGTH_LIMIT Add support for OTEL_SPAN_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE_LENGTH_LIMIT, OTEL_LINK_ATTRIBUTE_COUNT_LIMIT & OTEL_EVENT_ATTRIBUTE_COUNT_LIMIT Aug 17, 2021
@owais owais changed the title Add support for OTEL_SPAN_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE_LENGTH_LIMIT, OTEL_LINK_ATTRIBUTE_COUNT_LIMIT & OTEL_EVENT_ATTRIBUTE_COUNT_LIMIT Add support for additional Span Limits Aug 17, 2021
self._resource._attributes = BoundedAttributes(
self._span_limits.max_attributes,
self._resource._attributes,
max_value_len=self._span_limits.max_attribute_length,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This follows the existing pattern used with span events but technically mutates the resource as it'll end up truncating or dropping pre-existing attributes on a resource. I think in very strict terms it does mutate the resource but in practice this is what users would expect IMO. Curious to hear what other think about this.

Copy link
Member

@srikanthccv srikanthccv Aug 18, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I kind of confused why span limits are used with resource. We don't want to mutate resource since it is prohibited by the spec and I interpreted Resource as its own entity different from span/metric/log. Did the spec introduce limits for Resources?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@owais owais Aug 18, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Spec doesn't say anything about it AFAIK and I agree we can probably exclude resources completely. In practice the issues that limits solve don't really plague resources anyway. However, we were applying these limits (the default one at least) so far so this will be a behavioral change (128 max resource attributes to unlimited) although extremely unlikely to impact anyone. @lonewolf3739

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I personally don't find using span limits for resources to be good. Can we take this up in separate issue?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@owais owais Aug 18, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with you. Let's discuss in the SIG meeting.



_DEFAULT_LIMIT = 128
if limit is not None and isinstance(value, str):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could the attribute length truncation technically apply to other value types as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Spec limits it to only strings and arrays of strings where the limit applies to each element. https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/common/common.md#attribute-limits

if it is a string, if it exceeds that limit (counting any character in it as 1), SDKs MUST truncate that value, so that its length is at most equal to the limit,
if it is an array of strings, then apply the above rule to each of the values separately,
otherwise a value MUST NOT be truncated;

@@ -129,10 +148,10 @@ def __init__(
)
self.maxlen = maxlen
self.dropped = 0
self.max_value_len = max_value_len
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might need some validation for: Empty value is treated as infinity. Non-integer and negative values are invalid.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know this is a small ask but I ended up fixing too many unrelated issues in this PR. Created an issue for this and will take care of it in a separate one tomorrow. #2052

@@ -630,8 +637,10 @@ def _from_env_if_absent(
max_links=SpanLimits.UNSET,
max_event_attributes=SpanLimits.UNSET,
max_link_attributes=SpanLimits.UNSET,
max_attribute_length=SpanLimits.UNSET,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For some reason this limit is the only one in the specs to have notes. Negative values are invalid apparently? What do we do in those cases.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sure that note applies to all limits and it was just a mistake by the author. I'll take care of negative/unset values in a new PR (created issue: #2052)

@owais
Copy link
Contributor Author

owais commented Aug 18, 2021

@lzchen @lonewolf3739 please review public API check and add the label if everything looks good.

@owais owais added the Approve Public API check This label shows that the public symbols added or changed in a PR are strictly necessary label Aug 19, 2021
@owais
Copy link
Contributor Author

owais commented Aug 19, 2021

Public API check was approved on another PR with these changes so I'm self-approving the check here.

@owais owais merged commit 2a726e4 into open-telemetry:main Aug 19, 2021
@owais owais deleted the span-attr-length-limit branch August 19, 2021 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Approve Public API check This label shows that the public symbols added or changed in a PR are strictly necessary
Projects
None yet
3 participants