-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 451
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollback 3187 #3248
Rollback 3187 #3248
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
# One or more tracking issues related to the change | ||
issues: [3160] | ||
issues: [3242] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would make sense to create a new changelog entry for the rollback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I'm unfamiliar with the process. I think I've done it correctly now, but let me know if I missed something.
158dd00
to
d4516e2
Compare
this lgtm @foolusion can you resolve the conflicts so we can merge this prior to release? |
# Conflicts: # controllers/builder_test.go
d4516e2
to
b065f91
Compare
👍 Done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
component: target allocator | ||
|
||
# A brief description of the change. Surround your text with quotes ("") if it needs to start with a backtick (`). | ||
note: Rollback 3187 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should at least do #3187
, so this renders into a link to the PR in the changelog.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I wasn't sure about that since I thought it might consider it a line comment. Looks like it already got merged.
thank you for your contribution 🙇 |
Description: Rollback #3187
Fix #3242 with rollback of 3187. Please make sure this change works for clusters with custom domains before re submitting.
Link to tracking Issue(s): #3242
Testing: This rolls back to previously working code.
Documentation: None