-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ReportsRemoteConfig capability #112
Labels
required-for-stable
Required to be resolved before 1.0
Comments
I think this should be also resolved before 1.0. |
@andykellr what do you think? |
tigrannajaryan
added a commit
to tigrannajaryan/opamp-spec
that referenced
this issue
Jul 28, 2022
Resolves open-telemetry#112 All other status fields have a corresponding capability bit except this one. This results in a non-consistent looking implementation that has to rely on AcceptsRemoteConfig bit instead to figure out if RemoteConfigStatus reporting is expected, for example: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opamp-go/pull/105/files#diff-620a7a2b42e4a4c60a590b0cca50053006e4555c6e70f38dece2f3a6d7ed1338R214 Adding this bit makes the status fields and their corresponding capabilities bits consistent.
tigrannajaryan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 28, 2022
Resolves #112 All other status fields have a corresponding capability bit except this one. This results in a non-consistent looking implementation that has to rely on AcceptsRemoteConfig bit instead to figure out if RemoteConfigStatus reporting is expected, for example: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opamp-go/pull/105/files#diff-620a7a2b42e4a4c60a590b0cca50053006e4555c6e70f38dece2f3a6d7ed1338R214 Adding this bit makes the status fields and their corresponding capabilities bits consistent.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
All reporting capabilities currently are individually represented as a bit in the Capabilities field, export the capability to report remote config. I think we need to add this bit too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: