-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NNS update rebased #420
NNS update rebased #420
Conversation
46e39d0
to
26fa0a0
Compare
Rebase? |
Doesn't matter much at this stage. |
Is it post-release? |
That's why it's not a part of #419, see above. |
I see it is (was) based on #419 and has some additional changes but I do not see an explanation as to why not add it to the release. Dont mind though. |
Because of API changes, #266 (review). |
as well as i'd like to ask in #266 - pls describe motivation in the commits. Now it looks like "lets change just like that", but the behavior of the contract changes. Mb @AnnaShaleva will remind us being an original author |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Smth should be done here for sure.
The main motivation here is nspcc-dev/neo-go#2795. It's not related to #442/C#, btw, since C# interfaces for these methods are very much different. If we're to solve nspcc-dev/neo-go#2795 this becomes irrelevant, I think. |
In case if no records of the specified type found. Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <[email protected]>
And adjust method usages along the way. Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <[email protected]>
26fa0a0
to
5537326
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does not do things worse.
It's a rebase of #266 with some additions. It largely intersects with #419, but has two additional ones. Not intended to be merged immediately.