-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.3k
Debugger does not respect timer #9333
Comments
fyi: the break is because of this change: 6f04394#diff-a7a2d51d79b1c80c7458e0d056e3d86fR167 i.e. if I remove this line (https://github.com/joyent/node/blob/v0.12.0/src/timer_wrap.cc#L150) it is fixed. However, I don't know enough about node to make the fix without breaking that commit's intentions unfortunately =( |
please fix asap as this is a painful bug. |
Actually, after investigating this more carefully, it's not clear to me it's a duplicate of #9125. Reopening. |
It seems it also happens on v0.12. |
This is the same issue as #15447. The diff proposed there, although it will not necessarily be committed as is, fixes this issue. |
When a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect. The reason is that the value that represents the current time is not updated between the time the original callback is called and the time the added timer is processed by timers.listOnTimeout. That leads the logic in timers.listOnTimeout to do an incorrect computation that makes the added timer fire with a timeout of scheduledTimeout + timeSpentInCallback. This change fixes that and make timers scheduled within other timers' callbacks fire as expected. Fixes nodejs#9333 and nodejs#15447.
Thanks a bunch! |
When a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect. The reason is that the value that represents the current time is not updated between the time the original callback is called and the time the added timer is processed by timers.listOnTimeout. That leads the logic in timers.listOnTimeout to do an incorrect computation that makes the added timer fire with a timeout of scheduledTimeout + timeSpentInCallback. This change fixes that and make timers scheduled within other timers' callbacks fire as expected. Fixes nodejs#9333 and nodejs#15447.
When a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect. The reason is that the value that represents the current time is not updated between the time the original callback is called and the time the added timer is processed by timers.listOnTimeout. That leads the logic in timers.listOnTimeout to do an incorrect computation that makes the added timer fire with a timeout of scheduledTimeout + timeSpentInCallback. This change fixes that and make timers scheduled within other timers' callbacks fire as expected. Fixes nodejs#9333 and nodejs#15447.
When a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect. The reason is that the value that represents the current time is not updated between the time the original callback is called and the time the added timer is processed by timers.listOnTimeout. That leads the logic in timers.listOnTimeout to do an incorrect computation that makes the added timer fire with a timeout of scheduledTimeout + timeSpentInCallback. This change fixes that and make timers scheduled within other timers' callbacks fire as expected. Fixes nodejs#9333 and nodejs#15447. PR: nodejs#17203 PR-URL: nodejs#17203 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]>
Fixed by d38e865, which will be available in the upcoming v0.10.39 and v0.12.5 releases. |
Thanks @misterdjules! |
When a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect. The reason is that the value that represents the current time is not updated between the time the original callback is called and the time the added timer is processed by timers.listOnTimeout. That leads the logic in timers.listOnTimeout to do an incorrect computation that makes the added timer fire with a timeout of scheduledTimeout + timeSpentInCallback. This change fixes that and make timers scheduled within other timers' callbacks fire as expected. Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9333 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#15447 PR: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#17203 PR-URL: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#17203 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Conflicts: lib/timers.js test/common.js
Whenever a timer is scheduled within another timer, there are a few known issues that we are fixing: * Whenever the timer being scheduled has the same timeout value as the outer timer, the newly created timer can fire on the same tick of the event loop instead of during the next tick of the event loop * Whenever a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect This commit consists of nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#17203 and nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#25763. Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9333 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#15447 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#25607 Fixes: nodejs#5426 PR-URL: nodejs#3063
Whenever a timer is scheduled within another timer, there are a few known issues that we are fixing: * Whenever the timer being scheduled has the same timeout value as the outer timer, the newly created timer can fire on the same tick of the event loop instead of during the next tick of the event loop * Whenever a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect This commit consists of nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#17203 and nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#25763. Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9333 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#15447 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#25607 Fixes: #5426 PR-URL: #3063
Whenever a timer is scheduled within another timer, there are a few known issues that we are fixing: * Whenever the timer being scheduled has the same timeout value as the outer timer, the newly created timer can fire on the same tick of the event loop instead of during the next tick of the event loop * Whenever a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect This commit consists of nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#17203 and nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#25763. Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9333 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#15447 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#25607 Fixes: #5426 PR-URL: #3063
Whenever a timer is scheduled within another timer, there are a few known issues that we are fixing: * Whenever the timer being scheduled has the same timeout value as the outer timer, the newly created timer can fire on the same tick of the event loop instead of during the next tick of the event loop * Whenever a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect This commit consists of nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#17203 and nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#25763. Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9333 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#15447 Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#25607 Fixes: #5426 PR-URL: #3063
When a timer is added in another timer's callback, its underlying timer handle will be started with a timeout that is actually incorrect. The reason is that the value that represents the current time is not updated between the time the original callback is called and the time the added timer is processed by timers.listOnTimeout. That leads the logic in timers.listOnTimeout to do an incorrect computation that makes the added timer fire with a timeout of scheduledTimeout + timeSpentInCallback. This change fixes that and make timers scheduled within other timers' callbacks fire as expected. Fixes nodejs#9333 and nodejs#15447. PR: nodejs#17203 PR-URL: nodejs#17203 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]>
This was originally #9319, but I've reduced the case down more.
Note: this is happening with node 0.10.31 and above.
Given code
example.js
:ok I enter into debugger now:
My assumption is that the break points are messing up node's timer some how.
This may seem like a small issue in the debugger, but it's causing huge pains for Protractor users because all of protractor's code (which is using webdriver) is in a giant setInterval.
reference:
angular/protractor#1890
angular/protractor#1899
angular/protractor#1822
angular/protractor#1890
angular/protractor#1893
and the only workaround for that right now is to downgrade node to 0.10.30 or lower.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: