Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: security vulnerability CVE-2021-3765 in validator.js #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2022

Conversation

samstefan
Copy link
Contributor

@samstefan samstefan commented Apr 29, 2022

This is to fix the security vulnerability CVE-2021-3765 in validator.js < 13.7.0. This was patched in sequelize here sequelize/sequelize@d4f7558

I've also fixed sequelize-typescript at version 2.1.2 as 2.1.3 is not compatible with sequelize 6.10.0 due to this change sequelize/sequelize-typescript#1202. sequelize-typescript 2.1.3 was being installed in the CI due to the --no-lockfile flag passed to yarn.

This is to fix the security vulnerability CVE-2021-3765 in validator.js < 13.7.0

GHSA-qgmg-gppg-76g5

I've also fixed sequelize-typescript at version 2.1.2 as 2.1.3 is not compatible with sequelize 6.10.0 due to this change sequelize/sequelize-typescript#1202
@casbin-bot
Copy link

@Gabriel-403 @Zxilly @kingiw @nodece please review

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2244235376

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 86.207%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1040681555: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 100
Relevant Lines: 108

💛 - Coveralls

@hsluoyz hsluoyz merged commit ccf15eb into node-casbin:master Apr 29, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.3.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants