Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRMP-1330] - Add service-updates-link to footer #491

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MohammadIqbalAD-NHS
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@oliverbeumkes-nhs oliverbeumkes-nhs dismissed their stale review December 17, 2024 17:23

I didn't realise this was a draft

@MohammadIqbalAD-NHS MohammadIqbalAD-NHS marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 09:09
Copy link
Contributor

@abid-nhs abid-nhs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be worthwhile modifying Footer.test.txs to have the first test/it block to check all the links are present

@@ -15,6 +16,7 @@ function Footer() {
>
Privacy notice
</NHSFooter.ListItem>
<ServiceUpdatesLink />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed I was wondering if it would be worth making the <NHSFooter.ListItem for ServiceUpdatesLink in the same file rather than separate one like the privacy link Footer list item. This might help with consistency especially since the ServiceUpdatesLink might not be usable in other places as its made as a NHSFooter.listitem

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have modified this to no longer use a component but rather a constant within the Footer.tsx

Copy link
Contributor

@abid-nhs abid-nhs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good however cypress tests seems to be failing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants