loss and delay without reordering causes very slow transfer #6
Assignees
Labels
Comments
|
I don't know if it is luck or not but I got a new timeout again. I didn't get it for weeks: |
|
just to track the frequency, I got a new warning last night: |
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2020
When experimenting with bpf_send_signal() helper in our production environment (5.2 based), we experienced a deadlock in NMI mode: #5 [ffffc9002219f770] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff8110be24 #6 [ffffc9002219f770] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff81a43012 #7 [ffffc9002219f780] try_to_wake_up at ffffffff810e7ecd #8 [ffffc9002219f7e0] signal_wake_up_state at ffffffff810c7b55 #9 [ffffc9002219f7f0] __send_signal at ffffffff810c8602 #10 [ffffc9002219f830] do_send_sig_info at ffffffff810ca31a #11 [ffffc9002219f868] bpf_send_signal at ffffffff8119d227 #12 [ffffc9002219f988] bpf_overflow_handler at ffffffff811d4140 #13 [ffffc9002219f9e0] __perf_event_overflow at ffffffff811d68cf #14 [ffffc9002219fa10] perf_swevent_overflow at ffffffff811d6a09 #15 [ffffc9002219fa38] ___perf_sw_event at ffffffff811e0f47 #16 [ffffc9002219fc30] __schedule at ffffffff81a3e04d #17 [ffffc9002219fc90] schedule at ffffffff81a3e219 #18 [ffffc9002219fca0] futex_wait_queue_me at ffffffff8113d1b9 #19 [ffffc9002219fcd8] futex_wait at ffffffff8113e529 #20 [ffffc9002219fdf0] do_futex at ffffffff8113ffbc #21 [ffffc9002219fec0] __x64_sys_futex at ffffffff81140d1c #22 [ffffc9002219ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81002602 #23 [ffffc9002219ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81c00068 The above call stack is actually very similar to an issue reported by Commit eac9153 ("bpf/stackmap: Fix deadlock with rq_lock in bpf_get_stack()") by Song Liu. The only difference is bpf_send_signal() helper instead of bpf_get_stack() helper. The above deadlock is triggered with a perf_sw_event. Similar to Commit eac9153, the below almost identical reproducer used tracepoint point sched/sched_switch so the issue can be easily caught. /* stress_test.c */ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <pthread.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #define THREAD_COUNT 1000 char *filename; void *worker(void *p) { void *ptr; int fd; char *pptr; fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY); if (fd < 0) return NULL; while (1) { struct timespec ts = {0, 1000 + rand() % 2000}; ptr = mmap(NULL, 4096 * 64, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0); usleep(1); if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) { printf("failed to mmap\n"); break; } munmap(ptr, 4096 * 64); usleep(1); pptr = malloc(1); usleep(1); pptr[0] = 1; usleep(1); free(pptr); usleep(1); nanosleep(&ts, NULL); } close(fd); return NULL; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { void *ptr; int i; pthread_t threads[THREAD_COUNT]; if (argc < 2) return 0; filename = argv[1]; for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) { if (pthread_create(threads + i, NULL, worker, NULL)) { fprintf(stderr, "Error creating thread\n"); return 0; } } for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) pthread_join(threads[i], NULL); return 0; } and the following command: 1. run `stress_test /bin/ls` in one windown 2. hack bcc trace.py with the following change: --- a/tools/trace.py +++ b/tools/trace.py @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ BPF_PERF_OUTPUT(%s); __data.tgid = __tgid; __data.pid = __pid; bpf_get_current_comm(&__data.comm, sizeof(__data.comm)); + bpf_send_signal(10); %s %s %s.perf_submit(%s, &__data, sizeof(__data)); 3. in a different window run ./trace.py -p $(pidof stress_test) t:sched:sched_switch The deadlock can be reproduced in our production system. Similar to Song's fix, the fix is to delay sending signal if irqs is disabled to avoid deadlocks involving with rq_lock. With this change, my above stress-test in our production system won't cause deadlock any more. I also implemented a scale-down version of reproducer in the selftest (a subsequent commit). With latest bpf-next, it complains for the following potential deadlock. [ 32.832450] -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: [ 32.833100] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x80 [ 32.833696] task_rq_lock+0x2c/0xa0 [ 32.834182] task_sched_runtime+0x59/0xd0 [ 32.834721] thread_group_cputime+0x250/0x270 [ 32.835304] thread_group_cputime_adjusted+0x2e/0x70 [ 32.835959] do_task_stat+0x8a7/0xb80 [ 32.836461] proc_single_show+0x51/0xb0 ... [ 32.839512] -> #0 (&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock){....}: [ 32.840275] __lock_acquire+0x1358/0x1a20 [ 32.840826] lock_acquire+0xc7/0x1d0 [ 32.841309] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x80 [ 32.841916] __lock_task_sighand+0x79/0x160 [ 32.842465] do_send_sig_info+0x35/0x90 [ 32.842977] bpf_send_signal+0xa/0x10 [ 32.843464] bpf_prog_bc13ed9e4d3163e3_send_signal_tp_sched+0x465/0x1000 [ 32.844301] trace_call_bpf+0x115/0x270 [ 32.844809] perf_trace_run_bpf_submit+0x4a/0xc0 [ 32.845411] perf_trace_sched_switch+0x10f/0x180 [ 32.846014] __schedule+0x45d/0x880 [ 32.846483] schedule+0x5f/0xd0 ... [ 32.853148] Chain exists of: [ 32.853148] &(&sighand->siglock)->rlock --> &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock [ 32.853148] [ 32.854451] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 32.854451] [ 32.855173] CPU0 CPU1 [ 32.855745] ---- ---- [ 32.856278] lock(&rq->lock); [ 32.856671] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 32.857332] lock(&rq->lock); [ 32.857999] lock(&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock); Deadlock happens on CPU0 when it tries to acquire &sighand->siglock but it has been held by CPU1 and CPU1 tries to grab &rq->lock and cannot get it. This is not exactly the callstack in our production environment, but sympotom is similar and both locks are using spin_lock_irqsave() to acquire the lock, and both involves rq_lock. The fix to delay sending signal when irq is disabled also fixed this issue. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2020
Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Offload TC action pedit munge dsfield Petr says: The Spectrum switches allow packet prioritization based on DSCP on ingress, and update of DSCP on egress. This is configured through the DCB APP rules. For some use cases, assigning a custom DSCP value based on an ACL match is a better tool. To that end, offload FLOW_ACTION_MANGLE to permit changing of dsfield as a whole, or DSCP and ECN values in isolation. After fixing a commentary nit in patch #1, and mlxsw naming in patch #2, patches #3 and #4 add the offload to mlxsw. Patch #5 adds a forwarding selftest for pedit dsfield, applicable to SW as well as HW datapaths. Patch #6 adds a mlxsw-specific test to verify DSCP rewrite due to DCB APP rules is not performed on pedited packets. The tests only cover IPv4 dsfield setting. We have tests for IPv6 as well, but would like to postpone their contribution until the corresponding iproute patches have been accepted. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2020
Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Various static checkers fixes Jakub told me he gets some warnings with W=1, so I decided to check with sparse, smatch and coccinelle as well. This patch set fixes all the issues found. None are actual bugs / regressions and therefore not targeted at net. Patches #1-#2 add missing kernel-doc comments. Patch #3 removes dead code. Patch #4 reworks the ACL code to avoid defining a static variable in a header file. Patch #5 removes unnecessary conversion to bool that coccinelle warns about. Patch #6 avoids false-positive uninitialized symbol errors emitted by smatch. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2020
Ido Schimmel says:
====================
Add packet trap policers support
Background
==========
Devices capable of offloading the kernel's datapath and perform
functions such as bridging and routing must also be able to send (trap)
specific packets to the kernel (i.e., the CPU) for processing.
For example, a device acting as a multicast-aware bridge must be able to
trap IGMP membership reports to the kernel for processing by the bridge
module.
Motivation
==========
In most cases, the underlying device is capable of handling packet rates
that are several orders of magnitude higher compared to those that can
be handled by the CPU.
Therefore, in order to prevent the underlying device from overwhelming
the CPU, devices usually include packet trap policers that are able to
police the trapped packets to rates that can be handled by the CPU.
Proposed solution
=================
This patch set allows capable device drivers to register their supported
packet trap policers with devlink. User space can then tune the
parameters of these policers (currently, rate and burst size) and read
from the device the number of packets that were dropped by the policer,
if supported.
These packet trap policers can then be bound to existing packet trap
groups, which are used to aggregate logically related packet traps. As a
result, trapped packets are policed to rates that can be handled the
host CPU.
Example usage
=============
Instantiate netdevsim:
Dump available packet trap policers:
netdevsim/netdevsim10:
policer 1 rate 1000 burst 128
policer 2 rate 2000 burst 256
policer 3 rate 3000 burst 512
Change the parameters of a packet trap policer:
Bind a packet trap policer to a packet trap group:
Dump parameters and statistics of a packet trap policer:
netdevsim/netdevsim10:
policer 3 rate 100 burst 16
stats:
rx:
dropped 92
Unbind a packet trap policer from a packet trap group:
Patch set overview
==================
Patch #1 adds the core infrastructure in devlink which allows capable
device drivers to register their supported packet trap policers with
devlink.
Patch #2 extends the existing devlink-trap documentation.
Patch #3 extends netdevsim to register a few dummy packet trap policers
with devlink. Used later on to selftests the core infrastructure.
Patches #4-#5 adds infrastructure in devlink to allow binding of packet
trap policers to packet trap groups.
Patch #6 extends netdevsim to allow such binding.
Patch #7 adds a selftest over netdevsim that verifies the core
devlink-trap policers functionality.
Patches #8-#14 gradually add devlink-trap policers support in mlxsw.
Patch #15 adds a selftest over mlxsw. All registered packet trap
policers are verified to handle the configured rate and burst size.
Future plans
============
* Allow changing default association between packet traps and packet
trap groups
* Add more packet traps. For example, for control packets (e.g., IGMP)
v3:
* Rebase
v2 (address comments from Jiri and Jakub):
* Patch #1: Add 'strict_start_type' in devlink policy
* Patch #1: Have device drivers provide max/min rate/burst size for each
policer. Use them to check validity of user provided parameters
* Patch #3: Remove check about burst size being a power of 2 and instead
add a debugfs knob to fail the operation
* Patch #3: Provide max/min rate/burst size when registering policers
and remove the validity checks from nsim_dev_devlink_trap_policer_set()
* Patch #5: Check for presence of 'DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_ID' in
devlink_trap_group_set() and bail if not present
* Patch #5: Add extack error message in case trap group was partially
modified
* Patch #7: Add test case with new 'fail_trap_policer_set' knob
* Patch #7: Add test case for partially modified trap group
* Patch #10: Provide max/min rate/burst size when registering policers
* Patch #11: Remove the max/min validity checks from
__mlxsw_sp_trap_policer_set()
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2020
Undefined rproc_ops .kick method in remoteproc driver will result in "Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference" in rproc_virtio_notify, after firmware loading if: 1) .kick method wasn't defined in driver 2) resource_table exists in firmware and has "Virtio device entry" defined Let's refuse to register an rproc-induced virtio device if no kick method was defined for rproc. [ 13.180049][ T415] 8<--- cut here --- [ 13.190558][ T415] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 [ 13.212544][ T415] pgd = (ptrval) [ 13.217052][ T415] [00000000] *pgd=00000000 [ 13.224692][ T415] Internal error: Oops: 80000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM [ 13.231318][ T415] Modules linked in: rpmsg_char imx_rproc virtio_rpmsg_bus rpmsg_core [last unloaded: imx_rproc] [ 13.241687][ T415] CPU: 0 PID: 415 Comm: unload-load.sh Not tainted 5.5.2-00002-g707df13bbbdd #6 [ 13.250561][ T415] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX7 Dual (Device Tree) [ 13.257009][ T415] PC is at 0x0 [ 13.260249][ T415] LR is at rproc_virtio_notify+0x2c/0x54 [ 13.265738][ T415] pc : [<00000000>] lr : [<8050f6b0>] psr: 60010113 [ 13.272702][ T415] sp : b8d47c48 ip : 00000001 fp : bc04de00 [ 13.278625][ T415] r10: bc04c000 r9 : 00000cc0 r8 : b8d46000 [ 13.284548][ T415] r7 : 00000000 r6 : b898f200 r5 : 00000000 r4 : b8a29800 [ 13.291773][ T415] r3 : 00000000 r2 : 990a3ad4 r1 : 00000000 r0 : b8a29800 [ 13.299000][ T415] Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [ 13.306833][ T415] Control: 10c5387d Table: b8b4806a DAC: 00000051 [ 13.313278][ T415] Process unload-load.sh (pid: 415, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) [ 13.320591][ T415] Stack: (0xb8d47c48 to 0xb8d48000) [ 13.325651][ T415] 7c40: b895b680 00000001 b898f200 803c6430 b895bc80 7f00ae18 [ 13.334531][ T415] 7c60: 00000035 00000000 00000000 b9393200 80b3ed80 00004000 b9393268 bbf5a9a2 [ 13.343410][ T415] 7c80: 00000e00 00000200 00000000 7f00aff0 7f00a014 b895b680 b895b800 990a3ad4 [ 13.352290][ T415] 7ca0: 00000001 b898f210 b898f200 00000000 00000000 7f00e000 00000001 00000000 [ 13.361170][ T415] 7cc0: 00000000 803c62e0 80b2169c 802a0924 b898f210 00000000 00000000 b898f210 [ 13.370049][ T415] 7ce0: 80b9ba44 00000000 80b9ba48 00000000 7f00e000 00000008 80b2169c 80400114 [ 13.378929][ T415] 7d00: 80b2169c 8061fd64 b898f210 7f00e000 80400744 b8d46000 80b21634 80b21634 [ 13.387809][ T415] 7d20: 80b2169c 80400614 80b21634 80400718 7f00e000 00000000 b8d47d7c 80400744 [ 13.396689][ T415] 7d40: b8d46000 80b21634 80b21634 803fe338 b898f254 b80fe76c b8d32e38 990a3ad4 [ 13.405569][ T415] 7d60: fffffff3 b898f210 b8d46000 00000001 b898f254 803ffe7c 80857a90 b898f210 [ 13.414449][ T415] 7d80: 00000001 990a3ad4 b8d46000 b898f210 b898f210 80b17aec b8a29c20 803ff0a4 [ 13.423328][ T415] 7da0: b898f210 00000000 b8d46000 803fb8e0 b898f200 00000000 80b17aec b898f210 [ 13.432209][ T415] 7dc0: b8a29c20 990a3ad4 b895b900 b898f200 8050fb7c 80b17aec b898f210 b8a29c20 [ 13.441088][ T415] 7de0: b8a29800 b895b900 b8a29a04 803c5ec0 b8a29c00 b898f200 b8a29a20 00000007 [ 13.449968][ T415] 7e00: b8a29c20 8050fd78 b8a29800 00000000 b8a29a20 b8a29c04 b8a29820 b8a299d0 [ 13.458848][ T415] 7e20: b895b900 8050e5a4 b8a29800 b8a299d8 b8d46000 b8a299e0 b8a29820 b8a299d0 [ 13.467728][ T415] 7e40: b895b900 8050e008 000041ed 00000000 b8b8c440 b8a299d8 b8a299e0 b8a299d8 [ 13.476608][ T415] 7e60: b8b8c440 990a3ad4 00000000 b8a29820 b8b8c400 00000006 b8a29800 b895b880 [ 13.485487][ T415] 7e80: b8d47f78 00000000 00000000 8050f4b4 00000006 b895b890 b8b8c400 008fbea0 [ 13.494367][ T415] 7ea0: b895b880 8029f530 00000000 00000000 b8d46000 00000006 b8d46000 008fbea0 [ 13.503246][ T415] 7ec0: 8029f434 00000000 b8d46000 00000000 00000000 8021e2e4 0000000a 8061fd0c [ 13.512125][ T415] 7ee0: 0000000a b8af0c00 0000000a b8af0c40 00000001 b8af0c40 00000000 8061f910 [ 13.521005][ T415] 7f00: 0000000a 80240af4 00000002 b8d46000 00000000 8061fd0c 00000002 80232d7c [ 13.529884][ T415] 7f20: 00000000 b8d46000 00000000 990a3ad4 00000000 00000006 b8a62d80 008fbea0 [ 13.538764][ T415] 7f40: b8d47f78 00000000 b8d46000 00000000 00000000 802210c0 b88f2900 00000000 [ 13.547644][ T415] 7f60: b8a62d80 b8a62d80 b8d46000 00000006 008fbea0 80221320 00000000 00000000 [ 13.556524][ T415] 7f80: b8af0c00 990a3ad4 0000006c 008fbea0 76f1cda0 00000004 80101204 00000004 [ 13.565403][ T415] 7fa0: 00000000 80101000 0000006c 008fbea0 00000001 008fbea0 00000006 00000000 [ 13.574283][ T415] 7fc0: 0000006c 008fbea0 76f1cda0 00000004 00000006 00000006 00000000 00000000 [ 13.583162][ T415] 7fe0: 00000004 7ebaf7d0 76eb4c0b 76e3f206 600d0030 00000001 00000000 00000000 [ 13.592056][ T415] [<8050f6b0>] (rproc_virtio_notify) from [<803c6430>] (virtqueue_notify+0x1c/0x34) [ 13.601298][ T415] [<803c6430>] (virtqueue_notify) from [<7f00ae18>] (rpmsg_probe+0x280/0x380 [virtio_rpmsg_bus]) [ 13.611663][ T415] [<7f00ae18>] (rpmsg_probe [virtio_rpmsg_bus]) from [<803c62e0>] (virtio_dev_probe+0x1f8/0x2c4) [ 13.622022][ T415] [<803c62e0>] (virtio_dev_probe) from [<80400114>] (really_probe+0x200/0x450) [ 13.630817][ T415] [<80400114>] (really_probe) from [<80400614>] (driver_probe_device+0x16c/0x1ac) [ 13.639873][ T415] [<80400614>] (driver_probe_device) from [<803fe338>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xc8) [ 13.649102][ T415] [<803fe338>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<803ffe7c>] (__device_attach+0xd4/0x164) [ 13.658069][ T415] [<803ffe7c>] (__device_attach) from [<803ff0a4>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 13.666950][ T415] [<803ff0a4>] (bus_probe_device) from [<803fb8e0>] (device_add+0x444/0x768) [ 13.675572][ T415] [<803fb8e0>] (device_add) from [<803c5ec0>] (register_virtio_device+0xa4/0xfc) [ 13.684541][ T415] [<803c5ec0>] (register_virtio_device) from [<8050fd78>] (rproc_add_virtio_dev+0xcc/0x1b8) [ 13.694466][ T415] [<8050fd78>] (rproc_add_virtio_dev) from [<8050e5a4>] (rproc_start+0x148/0x200) [ 13.703521][ T415] [<8050e5a4>] (rproc_start) from [<8050e008>] (rproc_boot+0x384/0x5c0) [ 13.711708][ T415] [<8050e008>] (rproc_boot) from [<8050f4b4>] (state_store+0x3c/0xc8) [ 13.719723][ T415] [<8050f4b4>] (state_store) from [<8029f530>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xfc/0x214) [ 13.728348][ T415] [<8029f530>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<8021e2e4>] (__vfs_write+0x30/0x1cc) [ 13.736971][ T415] [<8021e2e4>] (__vfs_write) from [<802210c0>] (vfs_write+0xac/0x17c) [ 13.744985][ T415] [<802210c0>] (vfs_write) from [<80221320>] (ksys_write+0x64/0xe4) [ 13.752825][ T415] [<80221320>] (ksys_write) from [<80101000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54) [ 13.761178][ T415] Exception stack(0xb8d47fa8 to 0xb8d47ff0) [ 13.766932][ T415] 7fa0: 0000006c 008fbea0 00000001 008fbea0 00000006 00000000 [ 13.775811][ T415] 7fc0: 0000006c 008fbea0 76f1cda0 00000004 00000006 00000006 00000000 00000000 [ 13.784687][ T415] 7fe0: 00000004 7ebaf7d0 76eb4c0b 76e3f206 [ 13.790442][ T415] Code: bad PC value [ 13.839214][ T415] ---[ end trace 1fe21ecfc9f28852 ]--- Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]> Fixes: 7a18694 ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation") Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2020
Fix tcon use-after-free and NULL ptr deref.
Customer system crashes with the following kernel log:
[462233.169868] CIFS VFS: Cancelling wait for mid 4894753 cmd: 14 => a QUERY DIR
[462233.228045] CIFS VFS: cifs_put_smb_ses: Session Logoff failure rc=-4
[462233.305922] CIFS VFS: cifs_put_smb_ses: Session Logoff failure rc=-4
[462233.306205] CIFS VFS: cifs_put_smb_ses: Session Logoff failure rc=-4
[462233.347060] CIFS VFS: cifs_put_smb_ses: Session Logoff failure rc=-4
[462233.347107] CIFS VFS: Close unmatched open
[462233.347113] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000038
...
[exception RIP: cifs_put_tcon+0xa0] (this is doing tcon->ses->server)
#6 [...] smb2_cancelled_close_fid at ... [cifs]
#7 [...] process_one_work at ...
#8 [...] worker_thread at ...
#9 [...] kthread at ...
The most likely explanation we have is:
* When we put the last reference of a tcon (refcount=0), we close the
cached share root handle.
* If closing a handle is interrupted, SMB2_close() will
queue a SMB2_close() in a work thread.
* The queued object keeps a tcon ref so we bump the tcon
refcount, jumping from 0 to 1.
* We reach the end of cifs_put_tcon(), we free the tcon object despite
it now having a refcount of 1.
* The queued work now runs, but the tcon, ses & server was freed in
the meantime resulting in a crash.
THREAD 1
========
cifs_put_tcon => tcon refcount reach 0
SMB2_tdis
close_shroot_lease
close_shroot_lease_locked => if cached root has lease && refcount = 0
smb2_close_cached_fid => if cached root valid
SMB2_close => retry close in a thread if interrupted
smb2_handle_cancelled_close
__smb2_handle_cancelled_close => !! tcon refcount bump 0 => 1 !!
INIT_WORK(&cancelled->work, smb2_cancelled_close_fid);
queue_work(cifsiod_wq, &cancelled->work) => queue work
tconInfoFree(tcon); ==> freed!
cifs_put_smb_ses(ses); ==> freed!
THREAD 2 (workqueue)
========
smb2_cancelled_close_fid
SMB2_close(0, cancelled->tcon, ...); => use-after-free of tcon
cifs_put_tcon(cancelled->tcon); => tcon refcount reach 0 second time
*CRASH*
Fixes: d919131 ("CIFS: Close cached root handle only if it has a lease")
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Aptel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]>
|
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 1, 2020
Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Prepare SPAN API for upcoming changes Switched port analyzer (SPAN) is used for packet mirroring. Over mlxsw this is achieved by attaching tc-mirred action to either matchall or flower classifier. The current API used to configure SPAN consists of two functions: mlxsw_sp_span_mirror_add() and mlxsw_sp_span_mirror_del(). These two functions pack a lot of different operations: * SPAN agent configuration: Determining the egress port and optional headers that need to encapsulate the mirrored packet (when mirroring to a gretap, for example) * Egress mirror buffer configuration: Allocating / freeing a buffer when port is analyzed (inspected) at egress * SPAN agent binding: Binding the SPAN agent to a trigger, if any. The current triggers are incoming / outgoing packet and they are only used for matchall-based mirroring This non-modular design makes it difficult to extend the API for future changes, such as new mirror targets (CPU) and new global triggers (early dropped packets, for example). Therefore, this patch set gradually adds APIs for above mentioned operations and then converts the two existing users to use it instead of the old API. No functional changes intended. Tested with existing mirroring selftests. Patch set overview: Patches #1-#5 gradually add the new API Patches #6-#8 convert existing users to use the new API Patch #9 removes the old API ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
(again just for the record, from the last build today) |
|
(again just for the record, from the last build today) |
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2020
This BUG halt was reported a while back, but the patch somehow got missed: PID: 2879 TASK: c16adaa0 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "sctpn" #0 [f418dd28] crash_kexec at c04a7d8c #1 [f418dd7c] oops_end at c0863e02 #2 [f418dd90] do_invalid_op at c040aaca #3 [f418de28] error_code (via invalid_op) at c08631a5 EAX: f34baac0 EBX: 00000090 ECX: f418deb0 EDX: f5542950 EBP: 00000000 DS: 007b ESI: f34ba800 ES: 007b EDI: f418dea0 GS: 00e0 CS: 0060 EIP: c046fa5e ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010286 #4 [f418de5c] add_timer at c046fa5e #5 [f418de68] sctp_do_sm at f8db8c77 [sctp] #6 [f418df30] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN at f8dcc1b5 [sctp] #7 [f418df48] inet_shutdown at c080baf9 #8 [f418df5c] sys_shutdown at c079eedf #9 [f418df70] sys_socketcall at c079fe88 EAX: ffffffda EBX: 0000000d ECX: bfceea90 EDX: 0937af98 DS: 007b ESI: 0000000c ES: 007b EDI: b7150ae4 SS: 007b ESP: bfceea7c EBP: bfceeaa8 GS: 0033 CS: 0073 EIP: b775c424 ERR: 00000066 EFLAGS: 00000282 It appears that the side effect that starts the shutdown timer was processed multiple times, which can happen as multiple paths can trigger it. This of course leads to the BUG halt in add_timer getting called. Fix seems pretty straightforward, just check before the timer is added if its already been started. If it has mod the timer instead to min(current expiration, new expiration) Its been tested but not confirmed to fix the problem, as the issue has only occured in production environments where test kernels are enjoined from being installed. It appears to be a sane fix to me though. Also, recentely, Jere found a reproducer posted on list to confirm that this resolves the issues Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]> CC: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]> CC: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> CC: [email protected] CC: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 2, 2020
Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== the indirect flow_block infrastructure, revisited This series fixes b5140a3 ("netfilter: flowtable: add indr block setup support") that adds support for the indirect block for the flowtable. This patch crashes the kernel with the TC CT action. [ 630.908086] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000f0 [ 630.908233] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 630.908304] PGD 800000104addd067 P4D 800000104addd067 PUD 104311d067 PMD 0 [ 630.908380] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 630.908615] RIP: 0010:nf_flow_table_indr_block_cb+0xc0/0x190 [nf_flow_table] [ 630.908690] Code: 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 4c 89 75 a0 4c 89 65 a8 4d 89 ee 49 89 dd 4c 89 fe 48 c7 c7 b7 64 36 a0 31 c0 e8 ce ed d8 e0 <49> 8b b7 f0 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 c8 64 36 a0 31 c0 e8 b9 ed d8 e0 49[ 630.908790] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000895f8c0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [...] [ 630.910774] Call Trace: [ 630.911192] ? mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_block+0x270/0x270 [mlx5_core] [ 630.911621] ? mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_block+0x270/0x270 [mlx5_core] [ 630.912040] ? mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_block+0x270/0x270 [mlx5_core] [ 630.912443] flow_block_cmd+0x51/0x80 [ 630.912844] __flow_indr_block_cb_register+0x26c/0x510 [ 630.913265] mlx5e_nic_rep_netdevice_event+0x9e/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 630.913665] notifier_call_chain+0x53/0xa0 [ 630.914063] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [ 630.914466] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x39/0x90 [ 630.914859] register_netdevice+0x484/0x550 [ 630.915256] __ip_tunnel_create+0x12b/0x1f0 [ip_tunnel] [ 630.915661] ip_tunnel_init_net+0x116/0x180 [ip_tunnel] [ 630.916062] ipgre_tap_init_net+0x22/0x30 [ip_gre] [ 630.916458] ops_init+0x44/0x110 [ 630.916851] register_pernet_operations+0x112/0x200 A workaround patch to cure this crash has been proposed. However, there is another problem: The indirect flow_block still does not work for the new TC CT action. The problem is that the existing flow_indr_block_entry callback assumes you can look up for the flowtable from the netdevice to get the flow_block. This flow_block allows you to offload the flows via TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER. Unfortunately, it is not possible to get the flow_block from the TC CT flowtables because they are _not_ bound to any specific netdevice. = What is the indirect flow_block infrastructure? The indirect flow_block infrastructure allows drivers to offload tc/netfilter rules that belong to software tunnel netdevices, e.g. vxlan. This indirect flow_block infrastructure relates tunnel netdevices with drivers because there is no obvious way to relate these two things from the control plane. = How does the indirect flow_block work before this patchset? Front-ends register the indirect block callback through flow_indr_add_block_cb() if they support for offloading tunnel netdevices. == Setting up an indirect block 1) Drivers track tunnel netdevices via NETDEV_{REGISTER,UNREGISTER} events. If there is a new tunnel netdevice that the driver can offload, then the driver invokes __flow_indr_block_cb_register() with the new tunnel netdevice and the driver callback. The __flow_indr_block_cb_register() call iterates over the list of the front-end callbacks. 2) The front-end callback sets up the flow_block_offload structure and it invokes the driver callback to set up the flow_block. 3) The driver callback now registers the flow_block structure and it returns the flow_block back to the front-end. 4) The front-end gets the flow_block object and it is now ready to offload rules for this tunnel netdevice. A simplified callgraph is represented below. Front-end Driver NETDEV_REGISTER | __flow_indr_block_cb_register(netdev, cb_priv, driver_cb) | [1] .--------------frontend_indr_block_cb(cb_priv, driver_cb) | . setup_flow_block_offload(bo) | [2] driver_cb(bo, cb_priv) -----------. | \/ set up flow_blocks [3] | add rules to flow_block <---------- TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER [4] == Releasing the indirect flow_block There are two possibilities, either tunnel netdevice is removed or a netdevice (port representor) is removed. === Tunnel netdevice is removed Driver waits for the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event that announces the tunnel netdevice removal. Then, it calls __flow_indr_block_cb_unregister() to remove the flow_block and rules. Callgraph is very similar to the one described above. === Netdevice is removed (port representor) Driver calls __flow_indr_block_cb_unregister() to remove the existing netfilter/tc rule that belong to the tunnel netdevice. = How does the indirect flow_block work after this patchset? Drivers register the indirect flow_block setup callback through flow_indr_dev_register() if they support for offloading tunnel netdevices. == Setting up an indirect flow_block 1) Frontends check if dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc is unset. If so, frontends call flow_indr_dev_setup_offload(). This call invokes the drivers' indirect flow_block setup callback. 2) The indirect flow_block setup callback sets up a flow_block structure which relates the tunnel netdevice and the driver. 3) The front-end uses flow_block and offload the rules. Note that the operational to set up (non-indirect) flow_block is very similar. == Releasing the indirect flow_block === Tunnel netdevice is removed This calls flow_indr_dev_setup_offload() to set down the flow_block and remove the offloaded rules. This alternate path is exercised if dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc is unset. === Netdevice is removed (port representor) If a netdevice is removed, then it might need to to clean up the offloaded tc/netfilter rules that belongs to the tunnel netdevice: 1) The driver invokes flow_indr_dev_unregister() when a netdevice is removed. 2) This call iterates over the existing indirect flow_blocks and it invokes the cleanup callback to let the front-end remove the tc/netfilter rules. The cleanup callback already provides the flow_block that the front-end needs to clean up. Front-end Driver | flow_indr_dev_unregister(...) | iterate over list of indirect flow_block and invoke cleanup callback | .----------------------------- | . frontend_flow_block_cleanup(flow_block) . | \/ remove rules to flow_block TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER = About this patchset This patchset aims to address the existing TC CT problem while simplifying the indirect flow_block infrastructure. Saving 300 LoC in the flow_offload core and the drivers. The operational gets aligned with the (non-indirect) flow_blocks logic. Patchset is composed of: Patch #1 add nf_flow_table_gc_cleanup() which is required by the netfilter's flowtable new indirect flow_block approach. Patch #2 adds the flow_block_indr object which is actually part of of the flow_block object. This stores the indirect flow_block metadata such as the tunnel netdevice owner and the cleanup callback (in case the tunnel netdevice goes away). This patch adds flow_indr_dev_{un}register() to allow drivers to offer netdevice tunnel hardware offload to the front-ends. Then, front-ends call flow_indr_dev_setup_offload() to invoke the drivers to set up the (indirect) flow_block. Patch #3 add the tcf_block_offload_init() helper function, this is a preparation patch to adapt the tc front-end to use this new indirect flow_block infrastructure. Patch #4 updates the tc and netfilter front-ends to use the new indirect flow_block infrastructure. Patch #5 updates the mlx5 driver to use the new indirect flow_block infrastructure. Patch #6 updates the nfp driver to use the new indirect flow_block infrastructure. Patch #7 updates the bnxt driver to use the new indirect flow_block infrastructure. Patch #8 removes the indirect flow_block infrastructure version 1, now that frontends and drivers have been translated to version 2 (coming in this patchset). ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 2, 2020
Ido Schimmel says: ==================== devlink: Add support for control packet traps So far device drivers were only able to register drop and exception packet traps with devlink. These traps are used for packets that were either dropped by the underlying device or encountered an exception (e.g., missing neighbour entry) during forwarding. However, in the steady state, the majority of the packets being trapped to the CPU are packets that are required for the correct functioning of the control plane. For example, ARP request and IGMP query packets. This patch set allows device drivers to register such control traps with devlink and expose their default control plane policy to user space. User space can then tune the packet trap policer settings according to its needs, as with existing packet traps. In a similar fashion to exception traps, the action associated with such traps cannot be changed as it can easily break the control plane. Unlike drop and exception traps, packets trapped via control traps are not reported to the kernel's drop monitor as they are not indicative of any problem. Patch set overview: Patches #1-#3 break out layer 3 exceptions to a different group to provide better granularity. A future patch set will make this completely configurable. Patch #4 adds a new trap action ('mirror') that is used for packets that are forwarded by the device and sent to the CPU. Such packets are marked by device drivers with 'skb->offload_fwd_mark = 1' in order to prevent the kernel from forwarding them again. Patch #5 adds the new trap type, 'control'. Patches #6-#8 gradually add various control traps to devlink with proper documentation. Patch #9 adds a few control traps to netdevsim, which are automatically exercised by existing devlink-trap selftest. Patches #10 performs small refactoring in mlxsw. Patches #11-#13 change mlxsw to register its existing control traps with devlink. Patch #14 adds a selftest over mlxsw that exercises all the registered control traps. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 9, 2020
Implement rtas_call_reentrant() for reentrant rtas-calls: "ibm,int-on", "ibm,int-off",ibm,get-xive" and "ibm,set-xive". On LoPAPR Version 1.1 (March 24, 2016), from 7.3.10.1 to 7.3.10.4, items 2 and 3 say: 2 - For the PowerPC External Interrupt option: The * call must be reentrant to the number of processors on the platform. 3 - For the PowerPC External Interrupt option: The * argument call buffer for each simultaneous call must be physically unique. So, these rtas-calls can be called in a lockless way, if using a different buffer for each cpu doing such rtas call. For this, it was suggested to add the buffer (struct rtas_args) in the PACA struct, so each cpu can have it's own buffer. The PACA struct received a pointer to rtas buffer, which is allocated in the memory range available to rtas 32-bit. Reentrant rtas calls are useful to avoid deadlocks in crashing, where rtas-calls are needed, but some other thread crashed holding the rtas.lock. This is a backtrace of a deadlock from a kdump testing environment: #0 arch_spin_lock #1 lock_rtas () #2 rtas_call (token=8204, nargs=1, nret=1, outputs=0x0) #3 ics_rtas_mask_real_irq (hw_irq=4100) #4 machine_kexec_mask_interrupts #5 default_machine_crash_shutdown #6 machine_crash_shutdown #7 __crash_kexec #8 crash_kexec #9 oops_end Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]> [mpe: Move under #ifdef PSERIES to avoid build breakage] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2020
The first version of Clang that supports -tsan-distinguish-volatile will
be able to support KCSAN. The first Clang release to do so, will be
Clang 11. This is due to satisfying all the following requirements:
1. Never emit calls to __tsan_func_{entry,exit}.
2. __no_kcsan functions should not call anything, not even
kcsan_{enable,disable}_current(), when using __{READ,WRITE}_ONCE => Requires
leaving them plain!
3. Support atomic_{read,set}*() with KCSAN, which rely on
arch_atomic_{read,set}*() using __{READ,WRITE}_ONCE() => Because of
#2, rely on Clang 11's -tsan-distinguish-volatile support. We will
double-instrument atomic_{read,set}*(), but that's reasonable given
it's still lower cost than the data_race() variant due to avoiding 2
extra calls (kcsan_{en,dis}able_current() calls).
4. __always_inline functions inlined into __no_kcsan functions are never
instrumented.
5. __always_inline functions inlined into instrumented functions are
instrumented.
6. __no_kcsan_or_inline functions may be inlined into __no_kcsan functions =>
Implies leaving 'noinline' off of __no_kcsan_or_inline.
7. Because of #6, __no_kcsan and __no_kcsan_or_inline functions should never be
spuriously inlined into instrumented functions, causing the accesses of the
__no_kcsan function to be instrumented.
Older versions of Clang do not satisfy #3. The latest GCC currently
doesn't support at least #1, #3, and #7.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CANpmjNMTsY_8241bS7=XAfqvZHFLrVEkv_uM4aDUWE_kh3Rvbw@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
@pabeni I got the issue even after having applied "mptcp: add receive buffer auto-tuning": (not detected by my CI but manually launched on my VM using |
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 15, 2020
when a MPTCP client tries to connect to itself, tcp_finish_connect() is never reached. Because of this, depending on the socket current state, multiple faulty behaviours can be observed: 1) a WARN_ON() in subflow_data_ready() is hit WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 882 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:911 subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] CPU: 2 PID: 882 Comm: gh35 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #187 [...] RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] Call Trace: tcp_data_queue+0xd2f/0x4250 tcp_rcv_state_process+0xb1c/0x49d3 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2bc/0x790 __release_sock+0x153/0x2d0 release_sock+0x4f/0x170 mptcp_shutdown+0x167/0x4e0 __sys_shutdown+0xe6/0x180 __x64_sys_shutdown+0x50/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 2) client is stuck forever in mptcp_sendmsg() because the socket is not TCP_ESTABLISHED crash> bt 4847 PID: 4847 TASK: ffff88814b2fb100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "gh35" #0 [ffff8881376ff680] __schedule at ffffffff97248da4 #1 [ffff8881376ff778] schedule at ffffffff9724a34f #2 [ffff8881376ff7a0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff97252ba0 #3 [ffff8881376ff8a8] wait_woken at ffffffff958ab4ba #4 [ffff8881376ff940] sk_stream_wait_connect at ffffffff96c2d859 #5 [ffff8881376ffa28] mptcp_sendmsg at ffffffff97207fca #6 [ffff8881376ffbc0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff96be1b5b #7 [ffff8881376ffbe8] sock_write_iter at ffffffff96be1daa #8 [ffff8881376ffce8] new_sync_write at ffffffff95e5cb52 #9 [ffff8881376ffe50] vfs_write at ffffffff95e6547f #10 [ffff8881376ffe90] ksys_write at ffffffff95e65d26 #11 [ffff8881376fff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff956088ba #12 [ffff8881376fff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff9740008c RIP: 00007f126f6956ed RSP: 00007ffc2a320278 RFLAGS: 00000217 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000044 RCX: 00007f126f6956ed RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00000000004007b8 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2a3202a0 R8: 0000000000400720 R9: 0000000000400720 R10: 0000000000400720 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00000000004004b0 R13: 00007ffc2a320380 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b 3) tcpdump captures show that DSS is exchanged even when MP_CAPABLE handshake didn't complete. $ tcpdump -tnnr bad.pcap IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S], seq 3208913911, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291694721,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S.], seq 3208913911, ack 3208913912, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291706876,mptcp dss fin seq 0 subseq 0 len 1,nop,nop], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 2, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291707876], length 0 force a fallback to TCP in these cases, and adjust the main socket state to avoid hanging in mptcp_sendmsg(). Closes: #35 Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 15, 2020
when a MPTCP client tries to connect to itself, tcp_finish_connect() is never reached. Because of this, depending on the socket current state, multiple faulty behaviours can be observed: 1) a WARN_ON() in subflow_data_ready() is hit WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 882 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:911 subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] CPU: 2 PID: 882 Comm: gh35 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #187 [...] RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] Call Trace: tcp_data_queue+0xd2f/0x4250 tcp_rcv_state_process+0xb1c/0x49d3 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2bc/0x790 __release_sock+0x153/0x2d0 release_sock+0x4f/0x170 mptcp_shutdown+0x167/0x4e0 __sys_shutdown+0xe6/0x180 __x64_sys_shutdown+0x50/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 2) client is stuck forever in mptcp_sendmsg() because the socket is not TCP_ESTABLISHED crash> bt 4847 PID: 4847 TASK: ffff88814b2fb100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "gh35" #0 [ffff8881376ff680] __schedule at ffffffff97248da4 #1 [ffff8881376ff778] schedule at ffffffff9724a34f #2 [ffff8881376ff7a0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff97252ba0 #3 [ffff8881376ff8a8] wait_woken at ffffffff958ab4ba #4 [ffff8881376ff940] sk_stream_wait_connect at ffffffff96c2d859 #5 [ffff8881376ffa28] mptcp_sendmsg at ffffffff97207fca #6 [ffff8881376ffbc0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff96be1b5b #7 [ffff8881376ffbe8] sock_write_iter at ffffffff96be1daa #8 [ffff8881376ffce8] new_sync_write at ffffffff95e5cb52 #9 [ffff8881376ffe50] vfs_write at ffffffff95e6547f #10 [ffff8881376ffe90] ksys_write at ffffffff95e65d26 #11 [ffff8881376fff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff956088ba #12 [ffff8881376fff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff9740008c RIP: 00007f126f6956ed RSP: 00007ffc2a320278 RFLAGS: 00000217 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000044 RCX: 00007f126f6956ed RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00000000004007b8 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2a3202a0 R8: 0000000000400720 R9: 0000000000400720 R10: 0000000000400720 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00000000004004b0 R13: 00007ffc2a320380 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b 3) tcpdump captures show that DSS is exchanged even when MP_CAPABLE handshake didn't complete. $ tcpdump -tnnr bad.pcap IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S], seq 3208913911, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291694721,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S.], seq 3208913911, ack 3208913912, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291706876,mptcp dss fin seq 0 subseq 0 len 1,nop,nop], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 2, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291707876], length 0 force a fallback to TCP in these cases, and adjust the main socket state to avoid hanging in mptcp_sendmsg(). Closes: #35 Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <[email protected]>
|
I reproduced the issue with the capture option: Here is the capture for the transfer which took 25 seconds (in a zip file for GitHub...):
ns4-5ee79a56-X4O6gS-ns2-5ee79a56-X4O6gS-MPTCP-MPTCP-10.0.3.1.zip (please tell me if you need the other ones) |
|
I changed mptcp_connect.sh to get me a sender-side pcap. From what I see this is just due to unfortunate packet-loss (early-on in the connection) and high-RTT. It does not look like an MPTCP-issue but rather simply congestion-control kicking in. Are we sure that these timeouts are not happening with regular TCP? If that's the case, some interaction between TCP and MPTCP is making congestion-control slower to increase the congestion-window. |
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 16, 2020
when a MPTCP client tries to connect to itself, tcp_finish_connect() is never reached. Because of this, depending on the socket current state, multiple faulty behaviours can be observed: 1) a WARN_ON() in subflow_data_ready() is hit WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 882 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:911 subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] CPU: 2 PID: 882 Comm: gh35 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #187 [...] RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] Call Trace: tcp_data_queue+0xd2f/0x4250 tcp_rcv_state_process+0xb1c/0x49d3 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2bc/0x790 __release_sock+0x153/0x2d0 release_sock+0x4f/0x170 mptcp_shutdown+0x167/0x4e0 __sys_shutdown+0xe6/0x180 __x64_sys_shutdown+0x50/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 2) client is stuck forever in mptcp_sendmsg() because the socket is not TCP_ESTABLISHED crash> bt 4847 PID: 4847 TASK: ffff88814b2fb100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "gh35" #0 [ffff8881376ff680] __schedule at ffffffff97248da4 #1 [ffff8881376ff778] schedule at ffffffff9724a34f #2 [ffff8881376ff7a0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff97252ba0 #3 [ffff8881376ff8a8] wait_woken at ffffffff958ab4ba #4 [ffff8881376ff940] sk_stream_wait_connect at ffffffff96c2d859 #5 [ffff8881376ffa28] mptcp_sendmsg at ffffffff97207fca #6 [ffff8881376ffbc0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff96be1b5b #7 [ffff8881376ffbe8] sock_write_iter at ffffffff96be1daa #8 [ffff8881376ffce8] new_sync_write at ffffffff95e5cb52 #9 [ffff8881376ffe50] vfs_write at ffffffff95e6547f #10 [ffff8881376ffe90] ksys_write at ffffffff95e65d26 #11 [ffff8881376fff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff956088ba #12 [ffff8881376fff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff9740008c RIP: 00007f126f6956ed RSP: 00007ffc2a320278 RFLAGS: 00000217 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000044 RCX: 00007f126f6956ed RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00000000004007b8 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2a3202a0 R8: 0000000000400720 R9: 0000000000400720 R10: 0000000000400720 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00000000004004b0 R13: 00007ffc2a320380 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b 3) tcpdump captures show that DSS is exchanged even when MP_CAPABLE handshake didn't complete. $ tcpdump -tnnr bad.pcap IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S], seq 3208913911, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291694721,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S.], seq 3208913911, ack 3208913912, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291706876,mptcp dss fin seq 0 subseq 0 len 1,nop,nop], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 2, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291707876], length 0 force a fallback to TCP in these cases, and adjust the main socket state to avoid hanging in mptcp_sendmsg(). Closes: #35 Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 16, 2020
when a MPTCP client tries to connect to itself, tcp_finish_connect() is never reached. Because of this, depending on the socket current state, multiple faulty behaviours can be observed: 1) a WARN_ON() in subflow_data_ready() is hit WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 882 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:911 subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] CPU: 2 PID: 882 Comm: gh35 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #187 [...] RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] Call Trace: tcp_data_queue+0xd2f/0x4250 tcp_rcv_state_process+0xb1c/0x49d3 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2bc/0x790 __release_sock+0x153/0x2d0 release_sock+0x4f/0x170 mptcp_shutdown+0x167/0x4e0 __sys_shutdown+0xe6/0x180 __x64_sys_shutdown+0x50/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 2) client is stuck forever in mptcp_sendmsg() because the socket is not TCP_ESTABLISHED crash> bt 4847 PID: 4847 TASK: ffff88814b2fb100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "gh35" #0 [ffff8881376ff680] __schedule at ffffffff97248da4 #1 [ffff8881376ff778] schedule at ffffffff9724a34f #2 [ffff8881376ff7a0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff97252ba0 #3 [ffff8881376ff8a8] wait_woken at ffffffff958ab4ba #4 [ffff8881376ff940] sk_stream_wait_connect at ffffffff96c2d859 #5 [ffff8881376ffa28] mptcp_sendmsg at ffffffff97207fca #6 [ffff8881376ffbc0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff96be1b5b #7 [ffff8881376ffbe8] sock_write_iter at ffffffff96be1daa #8 [ffff8881376ffce8] new_sync_write at ffffffff95e5cb52 #9 [ffff8881376ffe50] vfs_write at ffffffff95e6547f #10 [ffff8881376ffe90] ksys_write at ffffffff95e65d26 #11 [ffff8881376fff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff956088ba #12 [ffff8881376fff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff9740008c RIP: 00007f126f6956ed RSP: 00007ffc2a320278 RFLAGS: 00000217 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000044 RCX: 00007f126f6956ed RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00000000004007b8 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2a3202a0 R8: 0000000000400720 R9: 0000000000400720 R10: 0000000000400720 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00000000004004b0 R13: 00007ffc2a320380 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b 3) tcpdump captures show that DSS is exchanged even when MP_CAPABLE handshake didn't complete. $ tcpdump -tnnr bad.pcap IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S], seq 3208913911, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291694721,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S.], seq 3208913911, ack 3208913912, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291706876,mptcp dss fin seq 0 subseq 0 len 1,nop,nop], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 2, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291707876], length 0 force a fallback to TCP in these cases, and adjust the main socket state to avoid hanging in mptcp_sendmsg(). Closes: #35 Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 18, 2020
when a MPTCP client tries to connect to itself, tcp_finish_connect() is never reached. Because of this, depending on the socket current state, multiple faulty behaviours can be observed: 1) a WARN_ON() in subflow_data_ready() is hit WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 882 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:911 subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] CPU: 2 PID: 882 Comm: gh35 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #187 [...] RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] Call Trace: tcp_data_queue+0xd2f/0x4250 tcp_rcv_state_process+0xb1c/0x49d3 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2bc/0x790 __release_sock+0x153/0x2d0 release_sock+0x4f/0x170 mptcp_shutdown+0x167/0x4e0 __sys_shutdown+0xe6/0x180 __x64_sys_shutdown+0x50/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 2) client is stuck forever in mptcp_sendmsg() because the socket is not TCP_ESTABLISHED crash> bt 4847 PID: 4847 TASK: ffff88814b2fb100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "gh35" #0 [ffff8881376ff680] __schedule at ffffffff97248da4 #1 [ffff8881376ff778] schedule at ffffffff9724a34f #2 [ffff8881376ff7a0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff97252ba0 #3 [ffff8881376ff8a8] wait_woken at ffffffff958ab4ba #4 [ffff8881376ff940] sk_stream_wait_connect at ffffffff96c2d859 #5 [ffff8881376ffa28] mptcp_sendmsg at ffffffff97207fca #6 [ffff8881376ffbc0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff96be1b5b #7 [ffff8881376ffbe8] sock_write_iter at ffffffff96be1daa #8 [ffff8881376ffce8] new_sync_write at ffffffff95e5cb52 #9 [ffff8881376ffe50] vfs_write at ffffffff95e6547f #10 [ffff8881376ffe90] ksys_write at ffffffff95e65d26 #11 [ffff8881376fff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff956088ba #12 [ffff8881376fff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff9740008c RIP: 00007f126f6956ed RSP: 00007ffc2a320278 RFLAGS: 00000217 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000044 RCX: 00007f126f6956ed RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00000000004007b8 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2a3202a0 R8: 0000000000400720 R9: 0000000000400720 R10: 0000000000400720 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00000000004004b0 R13: 00007ffc2a320380 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b 3) tcpdump captures show that DSS is exchanged even when MP_CAPABLE handshake didn't complete. $ tcpdump -tnnr bad.pcap IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S], seq 3208913911, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291694721,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S.], seq 3208913911, ack 3208913912, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291706876,mptcp dss fin seq 0 subseq 0 len 1,nop,nop], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 2, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291707876], length 0 force a fallback to TCP in these cases, and adjust the main socket state to avoid hanging in mptcp_sendmsg(). Closes: #35 Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <[email protected]>
|
@cpaasch indeed, you are right: I have the same issue with TCP! That's quite visible for the transfer between ns2 and ns4 in both v4 and v6: The delay is high ( Anyway, it looks like it is not linked to MPTCP. Should we close this issue? Or before, avoid having no re-ordering in our tests? Report this somewhere? |
|
From the pcap it looked like simply congestion-control that is kicking in. Thus, no concern regarding TCP. I don't know why this is not happening when reordering is enabled. Is the file-size in that case the same? |
jenkins-tessares
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 19, 2020
when a MPTCP client tries to connect to itself, tcp_finish_connect() is never reached. Because of this, depending on the socket current state, multiple faulty behaviours can be observed: 1) a WARN_ON() in subflow_data_ready() is hit WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 882 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:911 subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] CPU: 2 PID: 882 Comm: gh35 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #187 [...] RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready+0x18b/0x230 [...] Call Trace: tcp_data_queue+0xd2f/0x4250 tcp_rcv_state_process+0xb1c/0x49d3 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2bc/0x790 __release_sock+0x153/0x2d0 release_sock+0x4f/0x170 mptcp_shutdown+0x167/0x4e0 __sys_shutdown+0xe6/0x180 __x64_sys_shutdown+0x50/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 2) client is stuck forever in mptcp_sendmsg() because the socket is not TCP_ESTABLISHED crash> bt 4847 PID: 4847 TASK: ffff88814b2fb100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "gh35" #0 [ffff8881376ff680] __schedule at ffffffff97248da4 #1 [ffff8881376ff778] schedule at ffffffff9724a34f #2 [ffff8881376ff7a0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff97252ba0 #3 [ffff8881376ff8a8] wait_woken at ffffffff958ab4ba #4 [ffff8881376ff940] sk_stream_wait_connect at ffffffff96c2d859 #5 [ffff8881376ffa28] mptcp_sendmsg at ffffffff97207fca #6 [ffff8881376ffbc0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff96be1b5b #7 [ffff8881376ffbe8] sock_write_iter at ffffffff96be1daa #8 [ffff8881376ffce8] new_sync_write at ffffffff95e5cb52 #9 [ffff8881376ffe50] vfs_write at ffffffff95e6547f #10 [ffff8881376ffe90] ksys_write at ffffffff95e65d26 #11 [ffff8881376fff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff956088ba #12 [ffff8881376fff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff9740008c RIP: 00007f126f6956ed RSP: 00007ffc2a320278 RFLAGS: 00000217 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000044 RCX: 00007f126f6956ed RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00000000004007b8 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2a3202a0 R8: 0000000000400720 R9: 0000000000400720 R10: 0000000000400720 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00000000004004b0 R13: 00007ffc2a320380 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b 3) tcpdump captures show that DSS is exchanged even when MP_CAPABLE handshake didn't complete. $ tcpdump -tnnr bad.pcap IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S], seq 3208913911, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291694721,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [S.], seq 3208913911, ack 3208913912, win 65483, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876,nop,wscale 7,mptcp capable v1], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291706876 ecr 3291706876], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291706876,mptcp dss fin seq 0 subseq 0 len 1,nop,nop], length 0 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.20000: Flags [.], ack 2, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 3291707876 ecr 3291707876], length 0 force a fallback to TCP in these cases, and adjust the main socket state to avoid hanging in mptcp_sendmsg(). Closes: #35 Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 4, 2024
Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations. Translating the below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there's a writer, due to the fairness of r/w semaphores). CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 1 lock(&kvm->slots_lock); 2 lock(&vcpu->mutex); 3 lock(&kvm->srcu); 4 lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); 5 lock(kvm_lock); 6 lock(&kvm->slots_lock); 7 lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); 8 sync(&kvm->srcu); Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(): cpuhp_cpufreq_online() | -> cpufreq_online() | -> cpufreq_gov_performance_limits() | -> __cpufreq_driver_target() | -> __target_index() | -> cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() | -> cpufreq_notify_transition() | -> ... __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier() But, actually triggering such deadlocks is beyond rare due to the combination of dependencies and timings involved. E.g. the cpufreq notifier is only used on older CPUs without a constant TSC, mucking with the NX hugepage mitigation while VMs are running is very uncommon, and doing so while also onlining/offlining a CPU (necessary to generate contention on cpu_hotplug_lock) would be even more unusual. The most robust solution to the general cpu_hotplug_lock issue is likely to switch vm_list to be an RCU-protected list, e.g. so that x86's cpufreq notifier doesn't to take kvm_lock. For now, settle for fixing the most blatant deadlock, as switching to an RCU-protected list is a much more involved change, but add a comment in locking.rst to call out that care needs to be taken when walking holding kvm_lock and walking vm_list. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-smp--c257535a0c9d-pip #330 Tainted: G S O ------------------------------------------------------ tee/35048 is trying to acquire lock: ff6a80eced71e0a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm] but task is already holding lock: ffffffffc07abb08 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0 static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30 kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm] kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm] kvm_set_msr_common+0x9ae/0xf80 [kvm] vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel] __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xeca/0x10c0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}: __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0 synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30 kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x110/0x1c0 [kvm] kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e30 lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260 __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm] param_attr_store+0x93/0x100 module_attr_store+0x22/0x40 sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x28d/0x380 ksys_write+0x70/0xe0 __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x281b/0x2e60 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Cc: Chao Gao <[email protected]> Fixes: 0bf5049 ("KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock") Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]> Tested-by: Farrah Chen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2024
Tariq Toukan says: ==================== net/mlx5: hw counters refactor This is a patchset re-post, see: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected] In this patchset, Cosmin refactors hw counters and solves perf scaling issue. Series generated against: commit c824deb ("cxgb4: clip_tbl: Fix spelling mistake "wont" -> "won't"") HW counters are central to mlx5 driver operations. They are hardware objects created and used alongside most steering operations, and queried from a variety of places. Most counters are queried in bulk from a periodic task in fs_counters.c. Counter performance is important and as such, a variety of improvements have been done over the years. Currently, counters are allocated from pools, which are bulk allocated to amortize the cost of firmware commands. Counters are managed through an IDR, a doubly linked list and two atomic single linked lists. Adding/removing counters is a complex dance between user contexts requesting it and the mlx5_fc_stats_work task which does most of the work. Under high load (e.g. from connection tracking flow insertion/deletion), the counter code becomes a bottleneck, as seen on flame graphs. Whenever a counter is deleted, it gets added to a list and the wq task is scheduled to run immediately to actually delete it. This is done via mod_delayed_work which uses an internal spinlock. In some tests, waiting for this spinlock took up to 66% of all samples. This series refactors the counter code to use a more straight-forward approach, avoiding the mod_delayed_work problem and making the code easier to understand. For that: - patch #1 moves counters data structs to a more appropriate place. - patch #2 simplifies the bulk query allocation scheme by using vmalloc. - patch #3 replaces the IDR+3 lists with an xarray. This is the main patch of the series, solving the spinlock congestion issue. - patch #4 removes an unnecessary cacheline alignment causing a lot of memory to be wasted. - patches #5 and #6 are small cleanups enabled by the refactoring. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2024
Edward Cree says: ==================== sfc: per-queue stats This series implements the netdev_stat_ops interface for per-queue statistics in the sfc driver, partly using existing counters that were originally added for ethtool -S output. Changed in v4: * remove RFC tags Changed in v3: * make TX stats count completions rather than enqueues * add new patch #4 to account for XDP TX separately from netdev traffic and include it in base_stats * move the tx_queue->old_* members out of the fastpath cachelines * note on patch #6 that our hw_gso stats still count enqueues * RFC since net-next is closed right now Changed in v2: * exclude (dedicated) XDP TXQ stats from per-queue TX stats * explain patch #3 better ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
MPTCPimporter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
MPTCPimporter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Eric Dumazet says:
====================
net: remove RTNL from fib_seq_sum()
This series is inspired by a syzbot report showing
rtnl contention and one thread blocked in:
7 locks held by syz-executor/10835:
#0: ffff888033390420 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:2931 [inline]
#0: ffff888033390420 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x224/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:679
#1: ffff88806df6bc88 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1ea/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:325
#2: ffff888026fcf3c8 (kn->active#50){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x20e/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:326
#3: ffffffff8f56f848 (nsim_bus_dev_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: new_device_store+0x1b4/0x890 drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:166
#4: ffff88805e0140e8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_lock include/linux/device.h:1014 [inline]
#4: ffff88805e0140e8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach+0x8e/0x520 drivers/base/dd.c:1005
#5: ffff88805c5fb250 (&devlink->lock_key#55){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nsim_drv_probe+0xcb/0xb80 drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c:1534
#6: ffffffff8fcd1748 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fib_seq_sum+0x31/0x290 net/core/fib_notifier.c:46
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
…ation When testing the XDP_REDIRECT function on the LS1028A platform, we found a very reproducible issue that the Tx frames can no longer be sent out even if XDP_REDIRECT is turned off. Specifically, if there is a lot of traffic on Rx direction, when XDP_REDIRECT is turned on, the console may display some warnings like "timeout for tx ring #6 clear", and all redirected frames will be dropped, the detailed log is as follows. root@ls1028ardb:~# ./xdp-bench redirect eno0 eno2 Redirecting from eno0 (ifindex 3; driver fsl_enetc) to eno2 (ifindex 4; driver fsl_enetc) [203.849809] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.2 eno2: timeout for tx ring #5 clear [204.006051] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.2 eno2: timeout for tx ring #6 clear [204.161944] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.2 eno2: timeout for tx ring #7 clear eno0->eno2 1420505 rx/s 1420590 err,drop/s 0 xmit/s xmit eno0->eno2 0 xmit/s 1420590 drop/s 0 drv_err/s 15.71 bulk-avg eno0->eno2 1420484 rx/s 1420485 err,drop/s 0 xmit/s xmit eno0->eno2 0 xmit/s 1420485 drop/s 0 drv_err/s 15.71 bulk-avg By analyzing the XDP_REDIRECT implementation of enetc driver, the driver will reconfigure Tx and Rx BD rings when a bpf program is installed or uninstalled, but there is no mechanisms to block the redirected frames when enetc driver reconfigures rings. Similarly, XDP_TX verdicts on received frames can also lead to frames being enqueued in the Tx rings. Because XDP ignores the state set by the netif_tx_wake_queue() API, so introduce the ENETC_TX_DOWN flag to suppress transmission of XDP frames. Fixes: c33bfaf ("net: enetc: set up XDP program under enetc_reconfigure()") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
The Tx BD rings are disabled first in enetc_stop() and the driver waits for them to become empty. This operation is not safe while the ring is actively transmitting frames, and will cause the ring to not be empty and hardware exception. As described in the NETC block guide, software should only disable an active Tx ring after all pending ring entries have been consumed (i.e. when PI = CI). Disabling a transmit ring that is actively processing BDs risks a HW-SW race hazard whereby a hardware resource becomes assigned to work on one or more ring entries only to have those entries be removed due to the ring becoming disabled. When testing XDP_REDIRECT feautre, although all frames were blocked from being put into Tx rings during ring reconfiguration, the similar warning log was still encountered: fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.2 eno2: timeout for tx ring #6 clear fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.2 eno2: timeout for tx ring #7 clear The reason is that when there are still unsent frames in the Tx ring, disabling the Tx ring causes the remaining frames to be unable to be sent out. And the Tx ring cannot be restored, which means that even if the xdp program is uninstalled, the Tx frames cannot be sent out anymore. Therefore, correct the operation order in enect_start() and enect_stop(). Fixes: ff58fda ("net: enetc: prioritize ability to go down over packet processing") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 15, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 15, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
#6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
__napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
__release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
</TASK>
As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.
Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.
Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.
Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 18, 2024
On the node of an NFS client, some files saved in the mountpoint of the NFS server were copied to another location of the same NFS server. Accidentally, the nfs42_complete_copies() got a NULL-pointer dereference crash with the following syslog: [232064.838881] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232064.839360] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232066.588183] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000058 [232066.588586] Mem abort info: [232066.588701] ESR = 0x0000000096000007 [232066.588862] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [232066.589084] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [232066.589216] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [232066.589340] FSC = 0x07: level 3 translation fault [232066.589559] Data abort info: [232066.589683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [232066.589842] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [232066.589967] user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00002000956ff400 [232066.590231] [0000000000000058] pgd=08001100ae100003, p4d=08001100ae100003, pud=08001100ae100003, pmd=08001100b3c00003, pte=0000000000000000 [232066.590757] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [232066.590958] Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace fscache netfs ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_stack_o2cb ocfs2_dlm vhost_net vhost vhost_iotlb tap tun ipt_rpfilter xt_multiport ip_set_hash_ip ip_set_hash_net xfrm_interface xfrm6_tunnel tunnel4 tunnel6 esp4 ah4 wireguard libcurve25519_generic veth xt_addrtype xt_set nf_conntrack_netlink ip_set_hash_ipportnet ip_set_hash_ipportip ip_set_bitmap_port ip_set_hash_ipport dummy ip_set ip_vs_sh ip_vs_wrr ip_vs_rr ip_vs iptable_filter sch_ingress nfnetlink_cttimeout vport_gre ip_gre ip_tunnel gre vport_geneve geneve vport_vxlan vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel openvswitch nf_conncount dm_round_robin dm_service_time dm_multipath xt_nat xt_MASQUERADE nft_chain_nat nf_nat xt_mark xt_conntrack xt_comment nft_compat nft_counter nf_tables nfnetlink ocfs2 ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ipmi_ssif nbd overlay 8021q garp mrp bonding tls rfkill sunrpc ext4 mbcache jbd2 [232066.591052] vfat fat cas_cache cas_disk ses enclosure scsi_transport_sas sg acpi_ipmi ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler ip_tables vfio_pci vfio_pci_core vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp llc fuse xfs libcrc32c ast drm_vram_helper qla2xxx drm_kms_helper syscopyarea crct10dif_ce sysfillrect ghash_ce sysimgblt sha2_ce fb_sys_fops cec sha256_arm64 sha1_ce drm_ttm_helper ttm nvme_fc igb sbsa_gwdt nvme_fabrics drm nvme_core i2c_algo_bit i40e scsi_transport_fc megaraid_sas aes_neon_bs [232066.596953] CPU: 6 PID: 4124696 Comm: 10.253.166.125- Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.131-9.cl9_ocfs2.aarch64 #1 [232066.597356] Hardware name: Great Wall .\x93\x8e...RF6260 V5/GWMSSE2GL1T, BIOS T656FBE_V3.0.18 2024-01-06 [232066.597721] pstate: 20400009 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [232066.598034] pc : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x220/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598327] lr : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x12c/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598595] sp : ffff8000f568fc70 [232066.598731] x29: ffff8000f568fc70 x28: 0000000000001000 x27: ffff21003db33000 [232066.599030] x26: ffff800005521ae0 x25: ffff0100f98fa3f0 x24: 0000000000000001 [232066.599319] x23: ffff800009920008 x22: ffff21003db33040 x21: ffff21003db33050 [232066.599628] x20: ffff410172fe9e40 x19: ffff410172fe9e00 x18: 0000000000000000 [232066.599914] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000004 x15: 0000000000000000 [232066.600195] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800008e685a8 x12: 00000000eac0c6e6 [232066.600498] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000008 x9 : ffff8000054e5828 [232066.600784] x8 : 00000000ffffffbf x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 000000000a9eb14a [232066.601062] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff70ff8a14a800 x3 : 0000000000000058 [232066.601348] x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 54dce46366daa6c6 x0 : 0000000000000000 [232066.601636] Call trace: [232066.601749] nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x220/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.601998] nfs4_do_reclaim+0x1b8/0x28c [nfsv4] [232066.602218] nfs4_state_manager+0x928/0x10f0 [nfsv4] [232066.602455] nfs4_run_state_manager+0x78/0x1b0 [nfsv4] [232066.602690] kthread+0x110/0x114 [232066.602830] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [232066.602985] Code: 1400000d f9403f20 f9402e61 91016003 (f9402c00) [232066.603284] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [232066.606936] Starting crashdump kernel... [232066.607146] Bye! Analysing the vmcore, we know that nfs4_copy_state listed by destination nfs_server->ss_copies was added by the field copies in handle_async_copy(), and we found a waiting copy process with the stack as: PID: 3511963 TASK: ffff710028b47e00 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "cp" #0 [ffff8001116ef740] __switch_to at ffff8000081b92f4 #1 [ffff8001116ef760] __schedule at ffff800008dd0650 #2 [ffff8001116ef7c0] schedule at ffff800008dd0a00 #3 [ffff8001116ef7e0] schedule_timeout at ffff800008dd6aa0 #4 [ffff8001116ef860] __wait_for_common at ffff800008dd166c #5 [ffff8001116ef8e0] wait_for_completion_interruptible at ffff800008dd1898 #6 [ffff8001116ef8f0] handle_async_copy at ffff8000055142f4 [nfsv4] #7 [ffff8001116ef970] _nfs42_proc_copy at ffff8000055147c8 [nfsv4] #8 [ffff8001116efa80] nfs42_proc_copy at ffff800005514cf0 [nfsv4] #9 [ffff8001116efc50] __nfs4_copy_file_range.constprop.0 at ffff8000054ed694 [nfsv4] The NULL-pointer dereference was due to nfs42_complete_copies() listed the nfs_server->ss_copies by the field ss_copies of nfs4_copy_state. So the nfs4_copy_state address ffff0100f98fa3f0 was offset by 0x10 and the data accessed through this pointer was also incorrect. Generally, the ordered list nfs4_state_owner->so_states indicate open(O_RDWR) or open(O_WRITE) states are reclaimed firstly by nfs4_reclaim_open_state(). When destination state reclaim is failed with NFS_STATE_RECOVERY_FAILED and copies are not deleted in nfs_server->ss_copies, the source state may be passed to the nfs42_complete_copies() process earlier, resulting in this crash scene finally. To solve this issue, we add a list_head nfs_server->ss_src_copies for a server-to-server copy specially. Fixes: 0e65a32 ("NFS: handle source server reboot") Signed-off-by: Yanjun Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2024
Daniel Machon says:
====================
net: sparx5: add support for lan969x switch device
== Description:
This series is the second of a multi-part series, that prepares and adds
support for the new lan969x switch driver.
The upstreaming efforts is split into multiple series (might change a
bit as we go along):
1) Prepare the Sparx5 driver for lan969x (merged)
--> 2) add support lan969x (same basic features as Sparx5
provides excl. FDMA and VCAP).
3) Add support for lan969x VCAP, FDMA and RGMII
== Lan969x in short:
The lan969x Ethernet switch family [1] provides a rich set of
switching features and port configurations (up to 30 ports) from 10Mbps
to 10Gbps, with support for RGMII, SGMII, QSGMII, USGMII, and USXGMII,
ideal for industrial & process automation infrastructure applications,
transport, grid automation, power substation automation, and ring &
intra-ring topologies. The LAN969x family is hardware and software
compatible and scalable supporting 46Gbps to 102Gbps switch bandwidths.
== Preparing Sparx5 for lan969x:
The main preparation work for lan969x has already been merged [1].
After this series is applied, lan969x will have the same functionality
as Sparx5, except for VCAP and FDMA support. QoS features that requires
the VCAP (e.g. PSFP, port mirroring) will obviously not work until VCAP
support is added later.
== Patch breakdown:
Patch #1-#4 do some preparation work for lan969x
Patch #5 adds new registers required by lan969x
Patch #6 adds initial match data for all lan969x targets
Patch #7 defines the lan969x register differences
Patch #8 adds lan969x constants to match data
Patch #9 adds some lan969x ops in bulk
Patch #10 adds PTP function to ops
Patch #11 adds lan969x_calendar.c for calculating the calendar
Patch #12 makes additional use of the is_sparx5() macro to branch out
in certain places.
Patch #13 documents lan969x in the dt-bindings
Patch #14 adds lan969x compatible string to sparx5 driver
Patch #15 introduces new concept of per-target features
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241004-b4-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-v2-0-d3290f581663@microchip.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20241021-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v1-0-c8c49ef21e0f@microchip.com
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-0-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2024
If ufshcd_rtc_work calls ufshcd_rpm_put_sync() and the pm's usage_count is 0, we will enter the runtime suspend callback. However, the runtime suspend callback will wait to flush ufshcd_rtc_work, causing a deadlock. Replace ufshcd_rpm_put_sync() with ufshcd_rpm_put() to avoid the deadlock. Fixes: 6bf999e ("scsi: ufs: core: Add UFS RTC support") Cc: [email protected] #6.11.x Signed-off-by: Peter Wang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2024
Daniel Machon says:
====================
net: lan969x: add VCAP functionality
== Description:
This series is the third of a multi-part series, that prepares and adds
support for the new lan969x switch driver.
The upstreaming efforts is split into multiple series (might change a
bit as we go along):
1) Prepare the Sparx5 driver for lan969x (merged)
2) Add support for lan969x (same basic features as Sparx5
provides excl. FDMA and VCAP, merged).
--> 3) Add lan969x VCAP functionality.
4) Add RGMII and FDMA functionality.
== VCAP support:
The Versatile Content-Aware Processor (VCAP) is a content-aware packet
processor that allows wirespeed packet inspection for rich
implementation of, for example, advanced VLAN and QoS classification and
manipulations, IP source guarding, longest prefix matching for Layer-3
routing, and security features for wireline and wireless applications.
This is all achieved by programming rules into the VCAP.
When a VCAP is enabled, every frame passing through the switch is
analyzed and multiple keys are created based on the contents of the
frame. The frame is examined to determine the frame type (for example,
IPv4 TCP frame), so that the frame information is extracted according to
the frame type, port-specific configuration, and classification results
from the basic classification. Keys are applied to the VCAP and when
there is a match between a key and a rule in the VCAP, the rule is then
applied to the frame from which the key was extracted.
After this series is applied, the lan969x driver will support the same
VCAP functionality as Sparx5.
== Patch breakdown:
Patch #1 exposes some VCAP symbols for lan969x.
Patch #2 replaces VCAP uses of SPX5_PORTS with n_ports from the match
data.
Patch #3 adds new VCAP constants to match data
Patch #4 removes the is_sparx5() check to now initialize the VCAP API on
lan969x.
Patch #5 adds the auto-generated VCAP data for lan969x.
Patch #6 adds the VCAP configuration data for lan969x.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <[email protected]>
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241101-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-3-v1-0-3c76f22f4bfa@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
matttbe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2024
The following handshake mechanism needs be followed after firmware download is completed to bring the firmware to running state. After firmware fragments of Operational image are downloaded and secure sends result of the image succeeds, 1. Driver sends HCI Intel reset with boot option #1 to switch FW image. 2. FW sends Alive GP[0] MSIx 3. Driver enables data path (doorbell 0x460 for RBDs, etc...) 4. Driver gets Bootup event from firmware 5. Driver performs D0 entry to device (WRITE to IPC_Sleep_Control =0x0) 6. FW sends Alive GP[0] MSIx 7. Device host interface is fully set for BT protocol stack operation. 8. Driver may optionally get debug event with ID 0x97 which can be dropped For Intermediate loadger image, all the above steps are applicable expcept #5 and #6. On HCI_OP_RESET, firmware raises alive interrupt. Driver needs to wait for it before passing control over to bluetooth stack. Co-developed-by: Devegowda Chandrashekar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Devegowda Chandrashekar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When running
mptcp_connectkselftest, we can have timeouts when losses and delays are important but there is no re-ordering, e.g.We only have this issue when there is no re-ordering added with TC netem.
Note: when it is fixed, it could be good to reduce the default timeout, linked to https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1196109/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: