Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #511, fixing InterfaceAdapter abstract name lookup. #512

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GuillermoBlasco
Copy link

Solving issue #511. Now default methods are ignored, so they do not conflict with
interface (abstract) methods to implement.

Now default methods are ignored, so they do not conflict with
interface (abstract) methods to implement.
@gbrail
Copy link
Collaborator

gbrail commented Jan 16, 2019

Would it be possible to add a test case so that this doesn't regress? For instance, it looks like we have some default method tests already in testsrc/jstests/java8/call-default-method.js

@Jeffrey-P-McAteer
Copy link

Hi has there been anything blocking this fix from being merged in? I'm in a position at work where having this engine accept callback functions as Consumer<T> objects would be useful.

@GuillermoBlasco
Copy link
Author

Hi @Jeffrey-P-McAteer
Nothing but the missing tests :D anyhow I've been using rhino with that fix during almost a year and worked like a charm.

@rPraml
Copy link
Contributor

rPraml commented Dec 9, 2019

I ran into the same issue

@tonygermano
Copy link
Contributor

Suggest closing this as superseded by #631

@p-bakker
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing as superceded by #631

@p-bakker p-bakker closed this Jun 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants