Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VSTestPlusPlus with UI #3525

Merged

Conversation

RanjanarMS
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@msftclas
Copy link

msftclas commented Feb 2, 2017

Hi @RanjanarMS, I'm your friendly neighborhood Microsoft Pull Request Bot (You can call me MSBOT). Thanks for your contribution!


It looks like you're a Microsoft contributor (Ranjana Rathinam). If you're full-time, we DON'T require a Contribution License Agreement. If you are a vendor, please DO sign the electronic Contribution License Agreement. It will take 2 minutes and there's no faxing! https://cla.microsoft.com.

TTYL, MSBOT;

"Agent",
"MachineGroup"
],
"author": "Microsoft Corporation",
"version": {
"Major": 2,
"Minor": 0,
"Patch": 11
"Patch": 100
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

100 [](start = 17, length = 3)

any reason why 100?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed

},
"demands": [
"vstest"
],
"preview": "true",
"releaseNotes": "<ul><li><b>Test Impact Analysis:</b> Automatically select and run only the tests needed to validate the code change.</li><li>Support for minimatch patterns for specifying test assemblies.</li></ul>",
"releaseNotes" : "Adding the functionality to run distributed test with release phases.",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

releaseNotes" : "Adding the functionality to run distributed test with release phases [](start = 5, length = 85)

why remove old release notes? can you check with Prachi here

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will sync up with Prachi and put the right text in next iteration.

@@ -1,198 +1,260 @@
{
"id": "EF087383-EE5E-42C7-9A53-AB56C98420F9",
"name": "VSTest",
"friendlyName": "Visual Studio Test",
"friendlyName": "Visual Studio Test Plus Plus",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Plus Plus [](start = 40, length = 9)

why change this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed

"description": "Run tests with Visual Studio test runner",
"helpMarkDown": "[More Information](https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=835764)",
"category": "Test",
"visibility": [
"Build",
"Release"
],
"runsOn": [
"runsOn": [
"Agent",
"MachineGroup"
],
"author": "Microsoft Corporation",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we test upgrade scenario by creating a build definition with 2.11 task and then uploading this task and check if we queue build things are fine

{
"name": "vstestLocationMethod",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a way we can make sure thta definition which have selected this option can fall back to latest option automatically. so as we dont break their builds?

"visibleRule": "testSelector = testAssemblies && runOnlyImpactedTests = true"
},
{
"name": "testPlatform",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

testPlatform [](start = 20, length = 12)

why change the name? wont it break existing build def?

}
}

private async createAgent(retries: number) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we refactor agent command and run command in separate classes / files?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved TestAgent out.. And helper functions out

"Agent",
"MachineGroup"
],
"author": "Microsoft Corporation",
"version": {
"Major": 2,
"Minor": 0,
"Patch": 11
"Patch": 100
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

100 [](start = 17, length = 3)

i still see this as 100

},
{
"name": "vsTestVersion",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

vsTestVersion [](start = 21, length = 13)

if we rename this option people will always get vs 2015. specially when they are using test impact using 2017

@acesiddhu
Copy link
Contributor

    "Patch": 11

I am assuming all the change in master before it is pushed we will have bumped up the patch version. else next sprint deployment wont contains these changes.


Refers to: Tasks/VsTest/task.json:20 in ea1559f. [](commit_id = ea1559f, deletion_comment = False)

@acesiddhu
Copy link
Contributor

:shipit:

@kaadhina kaadhina merged commit 544bc5e into users/ranjanar/vstest++_refactor Feb 7, 2017
@RanjanarMS RanjanarMS deleted the users/ranjanar/vstest++_dta branch February 10, 2017 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants