fix: add missing inverses in relatedTo #1099
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- one side of the relationship existed but not the other side, ensure both sides of the relationship are relatedTo each other for proper backlinking etc - add a new line after all the strict options for proper grouping same as the other groups
This was referenced Sep 17, 2020
|
Great, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
one side of the relationship existed but not the other side, ensure
both sides of the relationship are relatedTo each other for proper
backlinking etc
add a new line after all the strict options for proper grouping same
as the other groups
Tags
Found while writing #1095 / #971
Review Notes
I omitted
allowJsandcheckJsfromemitDeclarationOnly'srelatedTobecause of #1098 , but can add them if that PR is rejected