Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test for POJO with Optional Getter and field with constraints #114

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 11, 2023

Conversation

sdelamo
Copy link
Contributor

@sdelamo sdelamo commented May 8, 2023

see #113

@sdelamo sdelamo linked an issue May 8, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@sdelamo sdelamo changed the title test for #113 [ci skip] test for POJO with Optional Getter and field with constraints May 8, 2023
@sdelamo
Copy link
Contributor Author

sdelamo commented May 8, 2023

@dstepanov is this something you could support?

@dstepanov dstepanov force-pushed the test-pojo-optional-getter branch from 5e6a618 to 2303469 Compare May 11, 2023 12:13
@dstepanov dstepanov force-pushed the test-pojo-optional-getter branch from 2303469 to c830ef0 Compare May 11, 2023 12:21
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@dstepanov dstepanov merged commit e34f28e into master May 11, 2023
@dstepanov dstepanov deleted the test-pojo-optional-getter branch May 11, 2023 12:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression POJO with Optional for field with constraints
2 participants