-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add "none" to slot analysis/data type #169
Conversation
Sorry for not looking at issue #166 sooner. I just read through it and it's not clear to me if this change needs to be here or in |
What's the case in which the analysis_type would be 'none'? Adding 'none' to a list of categorical values is very controversial. Some terminological resources do it extensively (like NCIT, I think) but I don't think we have done this in the nmdc-schema yet and I would prefer not to start. The slot is |
It's outlined in the linked issue #166 |
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ AnalysisTypeEnum metagenomics placeholder PV descr | |||
AnalysisTypeEnum metaproteomics placeholder PV descr | |||
AnalysisTypeEnum metatranscriptomics placeholder PV descr | |||
AnalysisTypeEnum natural organic matter placeholder PV descr | |||
AnalysisTypeEnum none placeholder PV descr |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bmeluch
Change 'none' to "bulk chemistry"
@pkalita-lbl should this change also be made in NMDC schema? I think the answer is yes, though I don't think we track this in nmdc-main. So maybe it's not important for data but would be good for consistancy. @bmeluch |
It should only be made in The path forward should be:
|
From #166, added "none" to AnalysisTypeEnum