Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto expand non-discriminatory sub levels #558

Closed
ssarrafan opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

Auto expand non-discriminatory sub levels #558

ssarrafan opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
SMALL 1-3 days

Comments

@ssarrafan
Copy link

GOLD - if sublevels are non-discriminatory then auto-expand; e.g. if I am looking already at fracking samples, then I have to click 5 times to see

Related to #448

@ssarrafan
Copy link
Author

Brandon, please add T-Shirt size and any questions. Team is trying to get an idea of the time/effort to do this.

@ssarrafan ssarrafan added this to the Sprint 9 milestone Dec 2, 2021
@subdavis
Copy link
Contributor

subdavis commented Dec 6, 2021

Sorry, I don't fully understand what's being asked here. Could you provide a screenshot of the view where this change is pertinent?

I'm going to guess that this relates to the screenshot below?

Screenshot from 2021-12-06 13-17-06

"Plants" and "Roots" are "non-discriminatory" and so should be auto-expanded, is that right?

I know for a fact that this widget as-packaged cannot do this, so we'd need to fork it (which I'm already planning to do eventually).

Probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 4 hours of work.

@subdavis subdavis added the SMALL 1-3 days label Dec 7, 2021
@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor

cmungall commented Dec 7, 2021

you understand correctly @subdavis - an in fact in this case you can also lump in host-associated

I am not sure if the functionality belongs in the widget or in a pre-processing step. Possibly the widget if facets can be dynamically combined

@ssarrafan
Copy link
Author

@subdavis do you need more information on this issue?

@subdavis
Copy link
Contributor

Nope, this is clear now, thank you.

@ssarrafan ssarrafan modified the milestones: Sprint 9, Sprint 10 Jan 4, 2022
@ssarrafan ssarrafan added the backlog Issues not assigned to a sprint or not finished during a sprint. Needs to be reprioritized. label Feb 1, 2022
@ssarrafan ssarrafan modified the milestones: Sprint 10, Sprint 11 Feb 1, 2022
@ssarrafan ssarrafan removed this from the Sprint 11 milestone Mar 4, 2022
@ssarrafan
Copy link
Author

Now that GSP is over is this a priority for March? @cmungall @subdavis @turbomam

@subdavis
Copy link
Contributor

This was done a while ago.

@ssarrafan ssarrafan removed the backlog Issues not assigned to a sprint or not finished during a sprint. Needs to be reprioritized. label May 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
SMALL 1-3 days
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants