Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: bump grafana to 9.5.13 #1795

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2024
Merged

fix: bump grafana to 9.5.13 #1795

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2024

Conversation

asekretenko
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?:
Bumps Grafana image to avoid critical CVEs present in 9.5.7

Which issue(s) does this PR fix?:

Closes https://github.com/mesosphere/kommander/issues/4145

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
No

Checklist

  • If the PR adds a version bump, ensure there is no breaking change in Licensing model (or NA).
  • If a chart is changed or app configuration is significantly changed, the chart version is correctly incremented (so that apps are not automatically upgraded from a previous version of DKP).

@d2iq-mergebot
Copy link
Contributor

This repo has @d2iq-mergebot integration. You can perform the following commands by submitting a comment. Submit a comment with content "@d2iq-mergebot help" to view more detailed help text and examples. Be sure the have a look at the mergebot documentation, too.For help using mergebot, please refer to the README file here: https://github.com/mesosphere/mergebot/blob/main/README.md
Enabled Mergebot commands:
@d2iq-mergebot test all
@d2iq-mergebot test
@d2iq-mergebot override-status
@d2iq-mergebot help
@d2iq-mergebot backport

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7359261902

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

We've detected an issue with your CI configuration that might affect the accuracy of this pull request's coverage report.
To ensure accuracy in future PRs, please see these guidelines.
A quick fix for this PR: rebase it; your next report should be accurate.

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 79.532%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7293529933: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 136
Relevant Lines: 171

💛 - Coveralls

@gracedo gracedo merged commit 537aff5 into main Jan 2, 2024
38 of 40 checks passed
@gracedo gracedo deleted the asekretenko/bump_grafana branch January 2, 2024 17:46
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2024

💔 All backports failed

Status Branch Result
release-2.7 Backport failed because of merge conflicts

Manual backport

To create the backport manually run:

backport --pr 1795

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation and see the Github Action logs for details

@gracedo
Copy link
Contributor

gracedo commented Jan 2, 2024

@asekretenko can you manually backport this to release-2.7? there is a conflict because of this change #1760 which downgraded grafana-logging and project-grafana-logging to 8.5 due to the newer version breaking one of our logging dashboards

mikolajb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2024
@mikolajb mikolajb mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2024
2 tasks
@mikolajb
Copy link
Contributor

mikolajb commented Jan 2, 2024

@asekretenko can you manually backport this to release-2.7? there is a conflict because of this change #1760 which downgraded grafana-logging and project-grafana-logging to 8.5 due to the newer version breaking one of our logging dashboards

I created a backport #1807

gracedo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2024
* fix: bump grafana to 9.5.13 (#1795)

* chore: Use 8.5.26

Co-authored-by: Grace Do <[email protected]>

* chore: Use 8.5.26

Co-authored-by: Grace Do <[email protected]>

* chore: Use 8.5.26

Co-authored-by: Grace Do <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Andrei Sekretenko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Grace Do <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants