Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Getter for full verification key #495

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

StanislavBreadless
Copy link
Collaborator

What ❔

Why ❔

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.

@StanislavBreadless StanislavBreadless marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2024 12:34
Comment on lines +22 to +25
/// @notice 2 points for gate selectors
ECPoint[2] gateSelectors;
/// @notice 4 points for permutations
ECPoint[4] permutation;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • setup
  • selectors
  • permutation

Should be all in plural?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure, setup I believe should be in singular. Permutations not sure cc @olesHolem

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are four distinct polynomials that define one permutation. I think permutationPolys and gateSetupPolys could be a good naming

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PS in the Plonk whitepaper they are also mentioned like permutation polynomials

@StanislavBreadless
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The feature that required this change has been removed from the timeline, so I close this PR as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants