Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mulrEDr, mulrEDl should be renamed to muleDr, muleDl #491

Closed
t6s opened this issue Dec 8, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #493
Closed

mulrEDr, mulrEDl should be renamed to muleDr, muleDl #491

t6s opened this issue Dec 8, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #493
Milestone

Comments

@t6s
Copy link
Member

t6s commented Dec 8, 2021

analysis/theories/ereal.v

Lines 1478 to 1486 in 39c80bd

Lemma mulrEDr x y z : x \is a fin_num -> y +? z -> x * (y + z) = x * y + x * z.
Proof.
rewrite /mule/=; move: x y z => [x| |] [y| |] [z| |] //= _; try
(by case: ltgtP => // -[] <-; rewrite ?(mul0r,add0r,adde0))
|| (by case: ltgtP => //; rewrite adde0).
by rewrite mulrDr.
Qed.
Lemma mulrEDl x y z : x \is a fin_num -> y +? z -> (y + z) * x = y * x + z * x.

The lemmas mulrEDr and mulrEDl does not seem to be following the conventional naming pattern: shouldn't they be muleDr and muleDl?

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 0.3.12 milestone Dec 10, 2021
affeldt-aist added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2021
@proux01 proux01 mentioned this issue Dec 10, 2021
affeldt-aist added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants