Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Remove abstract function bodies in closure rewriting #2610

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 23, 2018

Conversation

kfranqueiro
Copy link
Contributor

This allows us to throw informative errors in abstract methods for non-closure clients, while still including the @abstract annotation and not having closure throw a fit about an abstract method having a non-empty function body.

Copy link
Contributor

@patrickrodee patrickrodee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Nice

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 23, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2610 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2610   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.48%   98.48%           
=======================================
  Files          98       98           
  Lines        4230     4230           
  Branches      537      537           
=======================================
  Hits         4166     4166           
  Misses         64       64

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 68f4ad0...07423bf. Read the comment docs.

@kfranqueiro kfranqueiro merged commit 80cb942 into master Apr 23, 2018
@kfranqueiro kfranqueiro deleted the chore/rewrite-hollow-abstract branch April 23, 2018 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants