Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dbnode][coordinator] Ensure docs limit is propagated for search and aggregate RPCs #3108

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 21, 2021

Conversation

robskillington
Copy link
Collaborator

@robskillington robskillington commented Jan 21, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

Needs integration tests in scripts/docker-integration-tests/prometheus/test.sh.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing and/or backwards incompatible change?:

NONE

Does this PR require updating code package or user-facing documentation?:

NONE

@robskillington robskillington changed the title WIP [dbnode][coordinator] Ensure docs limit is propagated for search and … WIP [dbnode][coordinator] Ensure docs limit is propagated for search and aggregate RPCs Jan 21, 2021
@@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ func (accum *fetchTaggedResultAccumulator) AsAggregatedTagsIterator(
}

moreElems = hasMore
// Would count ever be above limit?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: remove

@nbroyles
Copy link
Collaborator

nit: Also, let's update the title to remove WIP

Copy link
Collaborator

@nbroyles nbroyles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG pending build fixes

@wesleyk wesleyk changed the title WIP [dbnode][coordinator] Ensure docs limit is propagated for search and aggregate RPCs [dbnode][coordinator] Ensure docs limit is propagated for search and aggregate RPCs Jan 21, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3108 (9be8ef9) into master (9be8ef9) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3108   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage    72.2%    72.2%           
=======================================
  Files        1084     1084           
  Lines      100290   100290           
=======================================
  Hits        72486    72486           
  Misses      22772    22772           
  Partials     5032     5032           
Flag Coverage Δ
aggregator 75.8% <0.0%> (ø)
cluster 84.8% <0.0%> (ø)
collector 84.3% <0.0%> (ø)
dbnode 78.7% <0.0%> (ø)
m3em 74.4% <0.0%> (ø)
m3ninx 73.1% <0.0%> (ø)
metrics 20.0% <0.0%> (ø)
msg 74.2% <0.0%> (ø)
query 67.2% <0.0%> (ø)
x 80.4% <0.0%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9be8ef9...f42a53a. Read the comment docs.

@wesleyk wesleyk merged commit 45e5e4a into master Jan 21, 2021
@wesleyk wesleyk deleted the fix-limit-propagation branch January 21, 2021 23:42
soundvibe added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2021
* master:
  [DOCS] Update to cluster docs (#3084)
  [dbnode][coordinator] Ensure docs limit is propagated for search and aggregate RPCs (#3108)
  [query] Take bounds into account for list endpoints (#3110)
  Add warning to changing blocksize (#3096)
  Add support for dynamic query limit overriding (#3090)
  [tests] test setups exported to allow us to use it from other packages (#3042)
  [query] Implemented Graphite's pow function (#3048)
  [dbnode] Direct conversion of encoded tags to doc.Metadata (#3087)
  [tests] Skip flaky TestWatchNoLeader (#3106)
  [dbnode] Faster search of tag bytes in convert.FromSeriesIDAndTags (#3075)
  Replace bytes.Compare() == 0 with bytes.Equal() (#3101)
  Capture seekerMgr instead Rlock (#3104)
  [m3db] Check bloom filter before stream request allocation (#3103)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants