feat: add semantic PR check to js-libp2p repos

[mpetrunic]

Summary

Resolves #81

Why do you need this?

What else do we need to know?

DRI: myself

Reviewer's Checklist

• It is clear where the request is coming from (if unsure, ask)
• All the automated checks passed
• The YAML changes reflect the summary of the request
• The Terraform plan posted as a comment reflects the summary of the request

[mpetrunic]

cc @achingbrain @wemeetagain

[github-actions]

Before merge, verify that all the following plans are correct. They will be applied as-is after the merge.

Terraform plans

libp2p

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

[galargh]

Thanks for creating the PR 😄 Once we move the file, it'll be good to go from the GitHub Management point of view. I'll let others review before the merge though.

[achingbrain]

I've not used this plugin before, does it pull the list of allowed scopes from the project config or does it need configuring in the action yaml?

[mpetrunic]

I've not used this plugin before, does it pull the list of allowed scopes from the project config or does it need configuring in the action yaml?

https://github.com/libp2p/github-mgmt/pull/93/files#diff-e23c8debbc471dd71fbc4c6a03ce8197bc673f0470a994c63be03769c5096917R20

[p-shahi]

@mpetrunic is all that's remaining for this a review? @thomaseizinger added pretty much the same thing in rust-libp2p so I think that's proof that this works. I approved but feel free to wait for @achingbrain

We'd want to enable this in go-libp2p too per: libp2p/go-libp2p#1931 cc @MarcoPolo

[mpetrunic]

@mpetrunic is all that's remaining for this a review? @thomaseizinger added pretty much the same thing in rust-libp2p so I think that's proof that this works. I approved but feel free to wait for @achingbrain

We'd want to enable this in go-libp2p too per: libp2p/go-libp2p#1931 cc @MarcoPolo

Yup, think we are all waiting for approves here^^

[thomaseizinger]

It works quite well for us!

Something I've also added is a lint for the length of the PR title to not exceed 72 chars. This might be interesting to include here as well.

[thomaseizinger]

cc @mxinden We should probably switch to this being managed through here as well, assuming we can agree on the set of scopes :)

[thomaseizinger]

We also allow refactor and ci. Something to consider :)

[p-shahi]

I added those two here.

[achingbrain]

LGTM

[p-shahi]

I'll let others review before the merge though.

@galargh I think you've already reviewed but I don't want to merge this without your approval. PTAL