Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes sync_channel assessment item bug #3859

Merged

Conversation

vkWeb
Copy link
Member

@vkWeb vkWeb commented Dec 2, 2022

Summary

This fixes a bug where tags argument was mistakenly passed instead of assessment_items in the sync channel endpoint controller.

Manual verification steps performed

Ran unit test, reverting the changes fails the written unit test.

References

References #3112.

Quoting from #3112:

Testing on hotfixes made me realize that #3803 fixes the backend part of it. But still in the frontend, the sync_channel updates are not getting reflected.

Only upon clearing index DB, I could see the results of sync_channel backend updates.


Contributor's Checklist

PR process:

  • If this is an important user-facing change, PR or related issue the CHANGELOG label been added to this PR. Note: items with this label will be added to the CHANGELOG at a later time
  • If this includes an internal dependency change, a link to the diff is provided
  • The docs label has been added if this introduces a change that needs to be updated in the user docs?
  • If any Python requirements have changed, the updated requirements.txt files also included in this PR
  • Opportunities for using Google Analytics here are noted
  • Migrations are safe for a large db

Studio-specifc:

  • All user-facing strings are translated properly
  • The notranslate class been added to elements that shouldn't be translated by Google Chrome's automatic translation feature (e.g. icons, user-generated text)
  • All UI components are LTR and RTL compliant
  • Views are organized into pages, components, and layouts directories as described in the docs
  • Users' storage used is recalculated properly on any changes to main tree files
  • If there new ways this uses user data that needs to be factored into our Privacy Policy, it has been noted.

Testing:

  • Code is clean and well-commented
  • Contributor has fully tested the PR manually
  • If there are any front-end changes, before/after screenshots are included
  • Critical user journeys are covered by Gherkin stories
  • Any new interactions have been added to the QA Sheet
  • Critical and brittle code paths are covered by unit tests

Reviewer's Checklist

This section is for reviewers to fill out.

  • Automated test coverage is satisfactory
  • PR is fully functional
  • PR has been tested for accessibility regressions
  • External dependency files were updated if necessary (yarn and pip)
  • Documentation is updated
  • Contributor is in AUTHORS.md

@vkWeb vkWeb requested review from bjester and rtibbles December 2, 2022 13:40
Copy link
Member

@bjester bjester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code changes look great and make sense 💯

@bjester bjester merged commit b63e0a3 into learningequality:hotfixes Dec 2, 2022
@bjester bjester mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants