-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
License incorrectly marked in setup.py #4382
Comments
I'm pretty sure we've discussed this already. Maybe it has to do with the fact that we are bundling other GPL licensed libraries. |
Possible values are listed here: https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=list_classifiers Unless you wanna go through every single license in python-packages, I'd suggest accepting this "safe side" value and instead focus our efforts on cleaning up the dependency burden. |
Oh, so I did actually go through python-packages, and the last time I did so, we didn't have any GPL libraries: Do you know of any that have since been added? On the JS side, it looks like the libraries that mention GPL are "Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL": If we simply depend on GPL libraries, my understanding is that doesn't force us to be GPL. However, our new "depending but then also static bundling for distribution" approach may still require GPL compliance (assuming we do actually have GPL code somewhere)? |
There are ~32 packages/modules in Anyways, searching doesn't reveal a lot of problems. Apparently
|
Fixed in #4384. |
Setup.py indicates that KA Lite is GPL, whereas it is actually MIT license:
https://github.com/learningequality/ka-lite/blob/0.15.x/setup.py#L355
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: