Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#15788 removed vendor specific content #15919

Closed

Conversation

jhbiggs
Copy link
Contributor

@jhbiggs jhbiggs commented Aug 18, 2019

Fix: Issue #15788

It looks like each link in this page refers to vendor-specific content, so I removed all links. Did you intend to see ALL links removed?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 18, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign ryanmcginnis
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @ryanmcginnis in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language sig/docs Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Docs. labels Aug 18, 2019
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 18, 2019

Deploy preview for kubernetes-io-master-staging ready!

Built with commit f1edb1f

https://deploy-preview-15919--kubernetes-io-master-staging.netlify.com

@jhbiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhbiggs commented Aug 18, 2019

/assign @ryanmcginnis

Copy link
Contributor

@xiangpengzhao xiangpengzhao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if we want to keep the vendor specific content.
/cc @zacharysarah

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ architecture design doc for more details.

{{% capture body %}}

## Node Status
### Node Status
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be ## here because the below ### Addresses (and others) are parts of it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure this commit should be part of this PR

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, whoops, sorry, I'll undo the change.

@thecrudge
Copy link
Contributor

My thought was to keep in line with the new style guide i.e. prometheus would be acceptable, but the GKE specific items would not. Possibly keep the linuxacademy CKA classes, but remove the Oracle related items, etc.

re: #15576

/cc @zacharysarah
/cc @jhbiggs

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@thecrudge: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: jhbiggs.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

My thought was to keep in line with the new style guide i.e. prometheus would be acceptable, but the GKE specific items would not. Possibly keep the linuxacademy CKA classes, but remove the Oracle related items, etc.

re: #15576

/cc @zacharysarah
/cc @jhbiggs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jhbiggs jhbiggs force-pushed the #15788-remove-vendor-specific-content branch from 46feb1b to 35e1565 Compare August 19, 2019 20:37
@ryanmcginnis ryanmcginnis removed their assignment Aug 19, 2019
@jhbiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhbiggs commented Aug 19, 2019

I reviewed @thecrudge 's comment and adjusted the commit accordingly. Please let me know what you think.

Copy link
Contributor

@zacharysarah zacharysarah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jhbiggs Thanks for this PR! ✨ Some of the deletions need to remain. (The affiliation of the Linux Academy with the Linux Foundation, as well as the LF's relation to the CNCF aren't obvious but are valid.) Otherwise LGTM.


* [Getting Started with Kubernetes Clusters on OCI Oracle Kubernetes Engine (OKE) (Learning Library)](https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=44785:50:0:::50:P50_EVENT_ID,P50_COURSE_ID:5935,256)

* [Google Kubernetes Engine Deep Dive (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/google-cloud-platform/training/course/name/google-kubernetes-engine-deep-dive)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L32 should remain. (The Linux Academy partners with the Linux Foundation, which is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zacharysarah why should L32 remain but L16 go? Both are Linux Academy links.

I actually believe both L32 and L16 should be removed if we're truly trying to be vendor-neutral on the website.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, @jaypipes maybe Im missing where he said L16 should go?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Scratch that, just looked at the commit. Yup, L16 should remain :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per today's weekly meeting, L16 should go because: even though it's a link from a permissible source, it's a link to third-party content. 😅

Good question, @jaypipes!


* [Google Kubernetes Engine Deep Dive (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/google-cloud-platform/training/course/name/google-kubernetes-engine-deep-dive)

* [Helm Deep Dive with Hands-On Labs (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/linux/training/course/name/helm-deep-dive-part-1)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L34 should remain. (The Linux Academy partners with the Linux Foundation, which is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)

* [Kubernetes Essentials with Hands-On Labs (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/linux/training/course/name/kubernetes-essentials)

* [Kubernetes for the Absolute Beginners with Hands-on Labs (KodeKloud)](https://kodekloud.com/p/kubernetes-for-the-absolute-beginners-hands-on)

* [Kubernetes Fundamentals (LFS258) (The Linux Foundation)](https://training.linuxfoundation.org/training/kubernetes-fundamentals/)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L46 should remain. (The Linux Foundation is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)

@@ -55,15 +31,5 @@ Here are some of the sites that offer online training for Kubernetes:

* [Learn Kubernetes by Doing - 100% Hands-On Experience (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/linux/training/course/name/learn-kubernetes-by-doing)

* [Learn Kubernetes using Interactive Hands-on Scenarios (Katacoda)](https://www.katacoda.com/courses/kubernetes/)

* [Microservice Applications in Kubernetes - 100% Hands-On Experience (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/devops/training/course/name/learn-microservices-by-doing)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L60 should remain. (The Linux Academy partners with the Linux Foundation, which is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)

* [Monitoring Kubernetes With Prometheus with Hands-On Labs (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/linux/training/course/name/kubernetes-and-prometheus)

* [Service Mesh with Istio with Hands-On Labs (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/linux/training/course/name/service-mesh-with-istio-part-1)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L64 should remain. (The Linux Academy partners with the Linux Foundation, which is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)

@thecrudge
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the review @zacharysarah , youre awesome!

Copy link
Contributor

@jaypipes jaypipes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should discuss this :)


* [Getting Started with Kubernetes Clusters on OCI Oracle Kubernetes Engine (OKE) (Learning Library)](https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=44785:50:0:::50:P50_EVENT_ID,P50_COURSE_ID:5935,256)

* [Google Kubernetes Engine Deep Dive (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/google-cloud-platform/training/course/name/google-kubernetes-engine-deep-dive)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zacharysarah why should L32 remain but L16 go? Both are Linux Academy links.

I actually believe both L32 and L16 should be removed if we're truly trying to be vendor-neutral on the website.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 22, 2019
@jhbiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhbiggs commented Aug 22, 2019

I added back the links I was pretty sure were agreeable. I'll make another change when you figure out the 16/32 controversy ;)

@zacharysarah
Copy link
Contributor

Holding for the results of the KEP arising from #15748.

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 8, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jhbiggs: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 6, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 5, 2020
@zacharysarah
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Feb 5, 2020
@kbhawkey
Copy link
Contributor

I am closing this PR until a decision has been made about #15748.
Feel free to reopen this PR or create a new PR.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kbhawkey: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

I am closing this PR until a decision has been made about #15748.
Feel free to reopen this PR or create a new PR.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. sig/docs Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Docs. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants