Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azure: use new label to identity GPU Nodes #7235

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor

@nojnhuh nojnhuh commented Sep 3, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR follows up from #7203 to migrate the Azure provider from using the accelerator label to identify GPU Nodes to the kubernetes.azure.com/accelerator. #7203 documented that users must set *both* labels in 1.31, so this change should not break users following that instruction.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

ACTION REQUIRED: VMSS GPU Nodes are now identified by the `kubernetes.azure.com/accelerator` label instead of `accelerator`.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/cluster-autoscaler area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 3, 2024
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ func (azure *AzureCloudProvider) Name() string {

// GPULabel returns the label added to nodes with GPU resource.
func (azure *AzureCloudProvider) GPULabel() string {
return legacyGPULabel // Use legacy to avoid breaking, for now
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

legacyGPULabel is still currently used in azure_template.go to scaffold new Nodes. I elected to keep that since it doesn't seem like it would hurt anything going forward and would be one less blocker in case users try to downgrade cluster-autoscaler from 1.32 to an older version.

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Sep 3, 2024

/assign @comtalyst

@comtalyst
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approved

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 4, 2024
@comtalyst
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: comtalyst, nojnhuh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8e11684 into kubernetes:master Sep 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@nojnhuh nojnhuh deleted the azure-gpu-label branch September 4, 2024 01:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cluster-autoscaler area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants