Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nfd-master: re-try on node update failures #1127

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2023

Conversation

marquiz
Copy link
Contributor

@marquiz marquiz commented Apr 13, 2023

Change the NFD API handler to re-try on node update failures. Will work around transient failures, making sure that failed nodes (i.e. nodes that we failed to update) don't need to wait for the 1 hour resync period before being tried again.

This is another problem revealed by the recent addition of e2e-tests for extended resources.

Change the NFD API handler to re-try on node update failures. Will work
around transient failures, making sure that failed nodes (i.e. nodes
that we failed to update) don't need to wait for the 1 hour resync
period before being tried again.
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: marquiz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from jjacobelli and kad April 13, 2023 13:32
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Apr 13, 2023
@marquiz
Copy link
Contributor Author

marquiz commented Apr 13, 2023

/assign @zvonkok

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 13, 2023

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-nfd ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6b2d107
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-nfd/deploys/6438045ea69d0a00087290c6
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1127--kubernetes-sigs-nfd.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 13, 2023
@zvonkok
Copy link
Contributor

zvonkok commented Apr 13, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 6c23b0f75ff7cab8b7c315aa61167931f2733c0f

@marquiz
Copy link
Contributor Author

marquiz commented Apr 13, 2023

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f9cc798 into kubernetes-sigs:master Apr 13, 2023
@marquiz marquiz deleted the devel/nfd-master-retry branch April 13, 2023 14:16
@marquiz marquiz mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2023
24 tasks
@marquiz
Copy link
Contributor Author

marquiz commented Apr 14, 2023

/cherry-pick release-0.12

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@marquiz: new pull request created: #1138

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-0.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants