-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement exemptFeatures for conformance profile #2515
implement exemptFeatures for conformance profile #2515
Conversation
Fixes: kubernetes-sigs#2513 Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: arkodg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for finding and fixing this @arkodg!
Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @arkodg!
/lgtm
// Add Exempt Features into unsupported features list | ||
if s.ExemptFeatures.Has(f) { | ||
suite.extendedUnsupportedFeatures[conformanceProfileName].Insert(f) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@arkodg can you add a follow up issue to prevent core features from being specified as "Exempt"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
raised #2524
/test pull-gateway-api-verify |
Fixes: #2513
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Implement the ExemptFeatures setting in Experimental Conformance Profile
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes # #2513
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: