-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
π Allow unsetting useExperimentalRetryJoin field from KubeadmControlPlane #9170
π Allow unsetting useExperimentalRetryJoin field from KubeadmControlPlane #9170
Conversation
Hi @MaxFedotov. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold cancel |
/area provider/control-plane-kubeadm |
60b1cb7
to
269cbfc
Compare
Looks okay in general +/- unit test failures |
269cbfc
to
9d22852
Compare
β¦.kubeadmConfigSpec
9d22852
to
b482d48
Compare
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 21a05d718b8a15c753f57fa96077fd4edf30caf9
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: killianmuldoon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-1.5 |
@killianmuldoon: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.5 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-1.4 |
@killianmuldoon: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.4 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@killianmuldoon: #9170 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.5":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@MaxFedotov Do you have some time to open manual cherry-picks for this PR? |
@killianmuldoon: #9170 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.4":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@sbueringer yes, sure. Just make 2 separate pull requests into release-1.4 and release-1.5 branches? |
Yes! Basically apply a cherry-pick of this commit to both branches and resolve conflicts |
Late feedback, PR title threw me off thinking we were about to remove the field from the APIs; rather it's just allowing it to change. Might need a reword in release notes later |
/retitle π Allow unsetting useExperimentalRetryJoin field from KubeadmControlPlane Won't help for the v1.6 release notes, but let's use this title for the cherry-picks |
We should take this into account this while publishing the upcoming release release notes /cc @g-gaston |
β¦.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Allow to drop useExperimentalRetryJoin from KubeadmControlPlane.kubeadmConfigSpec
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #9169