Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Use ClusterCacheTracker consistently (instead of NewClusterClient) #8744

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented May 25, 2023

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:
We still had a few places left where we created clients for the workload cluster via NewClusterClient instead of using ClusterCacheTracker. This PR replaces the last usages of NewClusterClient.

I expect that it's more efficent to use a cached client vs re-creating it all the time

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 25, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title 🌱 Use ClusterCacheTracker consistently (intead of NewClusterClient) [WIP] 🌱 Use ClusterCacheTracker consistently (instead of NewClusterClient) May 25, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 25, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-use-clustercachetracker-consistently branch from f6b1b07 to b42793e Compare June 1, 2023 15:06
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] 🌱 Use ClusterCacheTracker consistently (instead of NewClusterClient) 🌱 Use ClusterCacheTracker consistently (instead of NewClusterClient) Jun 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 1, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

sbueringer commented Jun 1, 2023

This PR is ready for review but I want to hold merging it so we can easily do a before/after comparison with the goofy provider.
/hold

/assign @fabriziopandini @killianmuldoon @ykakarap

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 1, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request Jun 12, 2023
27 tasks
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-use-clustercachetracker-consistently branch from b42793e to 051b006 Compare June 12, 2023 12:37
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

Nice cleanup!
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: be91c8c1cf48f2a8c1962e10efd29fdb1aa11772

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 12, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f37c329 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.5 milestone Jun 12, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/area clustercachetracker

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clustercachetracker Issues or PRs related to the clustercachetracker cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants